Jump to content

Family needed for qualified nanny share


johannaf

Recommended Posts

I'm a qualified British nanny with over 10 years experience, which has mostly been caring for children from newborn to pre-school age. This includes experience with siblings. I am a first aider and DBS checked, and am in the process of getting Ofsted-Registered. I'm University educated and I hold a clean driving licence, with my own car if this is needed.


My current employer and I are looking for a new family to join our nanny share from January. Ideally full day care, 4-5 days a week. The family live in Peckham Rye/Nunhead (SE15), I live in East Dulwich, and we're flexible about location for the share.



I'm full of enthusiasm and energy for the outdoors,baby groups and other fun activities, but also enjoy staying in being creative with games, puzzles, stories and I love to bake. I'm reliable, trustworthy, caring, positive and believe in having lots of fun. I'm well experienced with daily nursery routines, daily cooking, sole care and working with the parents.


I drop their 5 year old daughter off and pick her up from school (Harris Primary East Dulwich) and take care of their 10 month old son all day, 4 days a week.


Please PM me if you're interested!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...