Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with Loz. Terrorists want us to be afraid and affected. In reality they are small in number and can never really threaten our way of life. They don't have an army big enough. That doesn't help those who are murdered of course, but containment is the only defence we have at home. Sadly some plots are always going to get through, but in reality more people die in car accidents every year than do from attrocious attacks like those in Paris. We need to keep a sense of perspective and make sure the security services have everything they need to keep us as safe as possible.

Utter nonsense Blah Blah.. Small in number ?


70 years ago 1 man created a machine so vast it resulted in the deaths of millions of men, women and children globally.


That was an ideology such as we face today from a different group of extremists.

Some of which may well be already amongst us.


DulwichFox

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy what machine has killed millions that was

> created 70 years ago ?

> I was thinking nuclear weapons but the figure you

> state is grossly over the death count from that

> machine.


Hitler. The Nazis.


Are you one of those in denial about the Holocaust ?

And the millions of Russians that died.


Was a long time ago


Lest we forget


Foxy

This is not about you.


LAST NIGHT over 100 civilians lost their lives.


People have been effected by this event in one way or another, but Of course, some people are just so wrapped up in their own lives that not only does this point go straight over your heads but, of all the ways someone could choose to entertain themselves this evening, it had to be standing in their soggy back garden replicating the sound of gunshots.


Many events this evening have cancelled fireworks for this very reason.


It's inappropriate.

Every year, a few weeks before and after Bonfire night, fireworks are regularly let off, probably no more than hijinks from youngsters. The people who died in Paris were mainly young adults, out enjoying themselves, I'm sure they wouldn't want people to stop doing that, life has to go on otherwise the terrorists have won...

I think Foxy may have meant a killing machine.

I agree with OP, out of respect fireworks should not have been let off but it is individuals choice and so offence shoukd not be taken because others do not share same view.

Let the poster that Foxy aimed the comment at take offence if he/she chooses, dont stir the s#+t against Foxy.

Far too much 'offence' being banded around willy nilly. 127 people have judt been murdered across the channel, now that is offensive.

"Couldn't agree more! And calling someone a holocaust denier is grossly offensive IMO"


I was going to stand Foxy up for this one but I know he couldn't possibly mean it, regardless of whether he actually wrote it. So I'll take the insult on the chin, even though it was completely undeserved (ie . How can you deny the h

"Couldn't agree more! And calling someone a holocaust denier is grossly offensive IMO"


I was going to stand Foxy up for this one but I know he couldn't possibly really mean it, regardless of whether he actually wrote it. So I'll take the insult on the chin, even though it was completely undeserved (ie. How can you deny the holocaust when you don't even realise he's talking about the nazis).

This was the conversation..


70 years ago 1 man created a machine so vast it resulted in the deaths of millions of men, women and children globally.


Foxy what machine has killed millions that was created 70 years ago ?

I was thinking nuclear weapons but the figure you state is grossly over the death count from that machine.


Hitler. The Nazis.

Are you one of those in denial about the Holocaust ?

And the millions of Russians that died.



Oh I see Foxy, when you say machine you mean regime - with you now.


All sorted..


No malice intended..


DulwichFox

I believe that no malice was intended. But probably would have been better if it had gone like this.



> 70 years ago 1 man created a machine so vast it

> resulted in the deaths of millions of men, women

> and children globally.

>

> Foxy what machine has killed millions that was

> created 70 years ago ?

> I was thinking nuclear weapons but the figure you

> state is grossly over the death count from that

> machine.

>

> Hitler. The Nazis.



> Oh I see Foxy, when you say machine you mean

> regime - with you now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am no expert, but are your photos not saved in Google or similar, as well as being on your physical  phone? If so, you should just be able to access them on your new phone without actually having to move them over? Same with emails, normally, you just have to sign into your email account on your new phone to access them? Not sure re contacts, but I don't recall having any problems when getting a new phone. And apps you can just reinstall. Google or something like ChatGPT could probably "talk" you through sorting, deleting and editing photos and emails, if you can't find someone to help (sorry I can't, I'd be too worried about doing something wrong!) Good luck! Don't delete anything from your old phone until you are sure it's on your new phone!
    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...