Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It must be difficult to manage a modern life if you are not allowed to be on the Electoral Roll.


In search of "hawthorn hedges" I re-read the 1989 ecological field study of One Tree Hill.


On the top of the hill is some "relict acid grassland".


Apparently this is rare stuff that can be destroyed by one tree in the wrong place.


It might be necessary to cut back some trees/bushes/shrubs to the 1989 habitat disposition.


John K

Dear John K.

The Hawthorne Hedge was on Woodvale in Camberwell Old Cemetery.


And Mr. Kennedy, I would appreciate an apology for your saying I have no right to participate in local affairs because i am a recent arrival. I pay taxes, both council, income, and VAT. I found that comment typical of your style of discussion on this forum> it is totally unacceptable. If no apology is forthcoming, I will consider other actions.

  • 2 weeks later...

That is the disappointing response from the Friends of One Tree Hill (Local Nature Reserve) who seem, AFAICT, to have based their ecological assessment on Southwark's own submissions. They make a valid point about Holm Oak but ignore the effect on the local environment or even the Hill itself.


Have you seen the London iTree eco report? Very relevant I think especially when you consider flood water runoff and carbon sequestration.

http://www.forestry.gov.uk/london-itree

  • 4 weeks later...

HopOne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh it is hard to have a discussion round here for

> the tree choppers!

>

> Edhistory, yes it was statistical. Problem?


The random tiles of the sampling methodology.


See how many are in the East Dulwich and Nunhead Valley.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...