Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JAPS is wonderful! Entrance exam - I think if you can keep you and your child happy and unstressed and relaxed on the day of the exam, that goes miles! I'd recommend doing some "extra" entry exams (e.g. applying for a few more schools) before doing the ones for the schools you really want. Good Luck!

I have put both my children through HH from kindergarten to Year 2 and they loved it - such a nurturing school and both cried when they left (last one this year)

Both my children were luckily enough to be given offers to all the local prep schools so we could choose at that stage which one we felt was right based on their personality and ability.

I would highly recommend it.

Please pm me if you would like further info

  • 2 months later...

Hi Jamm1. This reply is probably way too late to be useful, but thought I'd post incase others are looking. Our DS is at HHS. The comments here and on Mum's Net seem to be split - some parents rave about HHS and others are pretty angry. I thought it might be helpful to try to explain why that might be.


Firstly, Nursery to Reception are run by a different team. I don't know a single parent who didn't think early years were amazing.


But the jump to Y1 in HHS it is HUGE. Whereas before the focus is on getting the child to enjoy school, in Y1 it is solely on entrance exams. Dulwich College will only accept children at 6 (for 7+ entry) that are 2.5 years ahead in reading and writing, however lovely and talented in other areas. It's much the same for Alleyn's and JAGs. This has put huge downward pressure on HH to ram a massive amount into Y1.


For some children this is fine. If you have a bright child with a naturally pliant/ competitive temperament who is also physically advanced (writing needs loads of co-ordination) HHS will train them in a way that ticks all the boxes. Parents of these kids tend to say they've had all the benefits of a small school and still got the results of a top Prep. In addition, parents of kids who are perhaps a bit borderline can say HHS nudges the child over the line and into places like Rosemead.


The parents who tend to be unhappy are those who's children do not fit the mould. That is not to say the child isn't bright. I know children who are near-genius but miserable or acting up under the pressure. A lot of parents feel, unfortunately I think probably correctly, that the school's response in these cases is week. Although the teachers/ head make a lot of noise about extra support, the main tactic is to punish poor performance (taking away time set aside for play is standard if the child hasn't written enough).


They are a non-selective school but their reputation is built on getting kids into schools that are becoming mega-selective. This means there is a wide variation in children's abilities and parents' expectations and not enough flexibility in either the teaching style or curriculum to cope. The way they manage to move at a pace that will get 50% of the kids into top preps is to leave the other 50% to sink or swim. While some have done really well, a significant minority have sunk spectacularly, hence the divided opinions amongst parents.


My advice would be to...

1/ Look at Y1 & 2 as closely as the early years

2/ Be really realistic about who your child is and what environment will suit them. It's not just how bright they are.

3/ Be realistic about what you are comfortable with. Some parents see it as 'stretching' the child, others see it as high-pressure 'cramming'. I don't think it says anything about you as a parent if you side one way or the other, you just need to be prepared for what comes with it.

Fwiw, Herne Hill will have a new head from September - she is the current deputy head and is a lot warmer than the present incumbent, although only time will tell if this will lead to any change in the previously mentioned criticisms.

DOI: have/had children in the early years at Herne Hill but not at Reception or higher up in the school, so have no personal experience of the pressure some describe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...