Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thank you James for reporting that the inquest has finally taken place. How that poor family, driver and witnesses have coped with the awfulness of the situation I really can't imagine. James I wonder if you can explain why it has taken 2.5 years to get to the conclusion of the inquest. I know many people at the time felt very strongly about the role the protracted roadworks played in the accident and although its no comfort for the family I hope lessons can be learnt from the way the roadworks and pedestrian safety were managed. Given this I don't understand why this has taken such a long time and feel the messages about missed opportunities should have been relayed sooner.


Do you get a sense that Southwark will use the verdict to look at how they respond to roadworks at such major junctions? Particularly in regards monitoring progress of work and ensuring adequate safety mechanisms are in place?


I do know you care deeply about this matter and remember at the time a conversation we had about the incident and I am pleased you have continued to take an interest in this matter. I will of course look at the link you have provided but hope you as a local councillor will also continue to get Our own local authority to look closely at how they can provide additional safeguards when lights are out of action!

Hi malleymoo,

I remember at the time how awful I felt about it. Someone who helped at the scene called me up and the description was harrowing second hand.


I'm at a loss for why it has taken so very long. I don't understand. I'll try and find out.


Afterwards I asked and pushed Southwark officials for pedestrian phasing on such temporary traffic lights and have since seen them a number of times implimented. When I havent seen them once or twice I've chased up for them.

The coroner wants DoT to ensure nationally this happens. Assuming they used rule 43 then the DoT has 55 days to respond.


Hence the improtance of asking MP's about it so they can add a little pressure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...