Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone ever moved their little one from a cot straight to a double bed? Am I just being mad even to think of the concept??


Have tried no2 in same room as no1 but it just hasn't worked as no2 not sleeping well. She's back in the back room which is now acting, at the same time, as her room / spare room / husband's office. It just about works with the cot but definitely won't work when she moves out the cot. As a double bed is best for when grandparents stay (not often but they travel from afar), the thought did come to me as to whether we could move her into the double bed - rather than a toddler or single bed - and then have her on a temporary bed in our room or no1's room when visitors come. But a 2-3year old in a double bed seems a bit excessive and not sure if she'd react to the change in amount of space. She does nap on the floor at nursery and took naps in a variety of places at the childminders so she's used to being out of the confines of the cot.


Just wondered if anyone else had ever tried it? Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9711-from-cot-to-double-bed/
Share on other sites

Hi NunheadMum,


Not done it yet, but have a similar situation in our house and will probably move our youngest into the double bed at some point.


I don't see any huge problem with it - as long as the bed isn't too far off the ground, and maybe you can put one side against the wall, and have a bed rail along the other side so she can't roll out.


In fact the double bed our little one will go into used to be her Dad's bed when he was little, so it is a bit of a family heirloom. Our 5 year old is very keen that she and her sister sleep in it together eventually, with her bedroom then becoming the playroom, and if this works out we will put a sofa bed in there for them to sleep on when we need to move them out to make room for visitors. I think in theory it may work, but given the 4 year ago gap I am half expecting her to have changed her mind by the time the little one is ready to go into the big bed, and sleeping well enough for them to share. We shall see!


Molly

That's exactly what we did - not really by design but because that's the only other bed we had in that room and as she'd never really taken to the cot anyway we'd already been resorting to co sleeping with her in the double bed in her room (which was the spare room).


It hasn't done her any harm at all - we laid pillows down both sides of the bed when she started sleeping in it by herself and she's absolutely fine. Now, however we've just installed bunk beds, so she's back to a single. We're keeping as close eye to see whether she falls out (of the bottom bunk I hasten to add), as she has a tendency to 'travel' in her sleep. Signs are good so far - but we'll let you know when she's been there longer.

Am quite surprised at other people doing this - thought we were really odd!

Completely the same situation as ryedalema - and I still do sleep off and on with her in it.

Perhaps because she never really slept in a cot and has always slept in double beds (in a variety of arrangements since being 7/8 months) we have had no problems. I have a bolster between her and the wall and use a pillow barrier on the other side of the bed if I'm not in it with her. She also has a canopy over her side and her own child set of bedding which moves out with her when people come to stay.

Thanks, great to hear I'm not mad for thinking of it! Good idea about having her own bedding which can move with her. And that bedguard is a great idea - much more workable than the big metal things which I guess wouldn't fit with a double bed.


Thanks all round.

We have got a really useful bed (from John Lewis) that is a single with another single that is stored underneath, which can be put up to the same height to make a large double. So it is a single most of the time, and can be put up into a (very comfy) double when needed for guests. Co-slept in it for ages, she is now in a cot, and going to use it as a single with a bed guard when ready to come out of the cot.
My niece went straight into a double and is still there 6 years later... it's actually better than a single in my humble opinion as they have so much space to rolla round they never fall out! Never bother with a toddler bed - they'll grow out of it a year later. Cotbeds with the sides off are an interim measure but there is no way any child over 3-3.5 could be comfortable in one. Both of mine went into full size single beds just after their 2nd birthdays - i'd have done doubles as make very handy guest options, but they share a room and refuse to be parted so not enough space

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...