Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Perhaps not, but loss of light might be an issue since all the flats face that way.


In any case, kids facilities should be supported in inner cities.



first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No doubt there will be a few who argue that this

> is the city, so what do you expect? I'd object but

> a number will say we need more housing at whatever

> cost. I'm not sure that having "views stolen" is

> an argument that cuts it these days.

Possibly but it's outside of his ward. South Camberwell I think.


keane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That playground isa vitalocal resource used by so

> many local kids & they run some really good

> holiday projects for young people. Is James Barber

> aware?

Healey, I doubt even loss of light will cut it. You can see lots of local developments where there is loss of light as well as views but those developments are still being driven through. Think of the studio flats that are being built on small strips of grass on the Dog Kennel Hill Estate. The underpinning rationale is this is the city and homes are needed, so cram 'em in and build 'em high. You may even find play areas are viewed as a luxury if instead homes could be built on that space.



Healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps not, but loss of light might be an issue

> since all the flats face that way.

>

> In any case, kids facilities should be supported

> in inner cities.

>

>

> first mate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No doubt there will be a few who argue that

> this

> > is the city, so what do you expect? I'd object

> but

> > a number will say we need more housing at

> whatever

> > cost. I'm not sure that having "views stolen"

> is

> > an argument that cuts it these days.

I think the threat might be in their funding -- the council is cutting youth services and they will prioritise their own services (like putting money into Peckham Rye AP) vs. one in the voluntary sector. We need to fight to save our local services, and the DKAP is an important one! Its much more than an AP -- its a sanctuary for a lot of kids.

Marshalls Dad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm afraid your source is not as solid as you

> think andrewc. I was at the adventure playground

> yesterday and spoke to Patrick regarding this

> thread and he assures me it's untrue.


That's good news. Thanks.

Hello there,


Kate here from Dog Kennel Hill Adventure Playground.


Just to say we are not closing down, so please dont worry.


We are however closed tomorrow, but are back open Thursday & then reopen next tuesday for our Easter Playscheme.


Thanks so much Kate


P.S We appreciate all of the lovely calls & visits we have had making sure we are not closing!

I wish our other posts would get this much attention! this has had over 1000 veiws....our fundrasing/donation posts get about 100 views :(


If everyone who viewed this donated ?40 this would be the whole of our yearly funding that the playground needs....just saying lol


Kate x

I've just made a donation too. My kids have spent many a happy hour racing around the adventure playground having fun with their friends. The team who run the playground are just wonderful and I hope my donation will help with development plans. Thank you, DKHAP!


http://uk.virginmoneygiving.com/charity-web/charity/finalCharityHomepage.action?charityId=1006023

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...