Jump to content

Account Manager - SE23


Recommended Posts

Account Manager ? Forest Hill


APT Search is a boutique IT Recruitment firm based in Forest Hill. We currently have an opportunity for an account manager to work closely with a senior consultant and to deliver to an existing client base.


The opportunity requires a confident, well-spoken and personable attitude with excellent IT and communication skills. The role requires someone with excellent task management skills in order to work on multiple projects.


Working within a small but growing team, tasks will vary upon day-to-day but be based around research, marketing and a telephone based role speaking with potential candidates for clients at professional services firms, law firms, consultancy and corporate clients.


Requirements:


? Previous experience working within an office is essential. Past duties may include:

administrative tasks; personal assistant experience; working across various stages of recruitment and in-depth client-facing assignments

? Must have strong telephone skills with a personable yet confident approach.

? Experience in a sales-focussed role is desirable

? Excellent organisational skills

? Experience in Microsoft Office, Linked in and Twitter

? Previous experience using various emailing and CRM systems is desirable

? Ability to be self-motivated, work on own initiative and undertake tasks autonomously


Any experience, interest or insight within Data Analytics, Information Governance or Legal Technology would also be beneficial.


This is an exciting opportunity for someone that?s perhaps got experience of working in a similar position in the city interested in working locally.


To apply for this position, please send a CV and brief covering letter to:

Amit Pandit

[email protected]

http://www.apt-search.co.uk


Salary ?20,000 to ?24,000 base dependent on experience

Extra earning potential through commission.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/98509-account-manager-se23/
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...