Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Due to restructuring, my employer started individual consultation re risk of redundancy (as less than 20 employees involved)a month before I was due to return from the full 52wks mat leave.


The consultation period finished 2 days after my official return to work date and the findings of the consultation were announced two weeks later - I was told my position did not form part of the new structure and I continued to be 'at risk' of redundancy. Much as this was after my official return to work date I had not actually gone back and was on leave accrued whilst on mat leave, which my employer was allowing me to take straight away. They are now saying they do not have the additional mat responsibility of offering me a suitable alternative role on the same terms and conditions as the final announcement was made after my return to work date. I think as they started the whole process whilst I was on mat leave they are wrong? Any advice greatly appreciated.


On from this they have made the decision on the basis 'post goes post holder goes' without doing any kind of skills matrix, which is all I can find reference to all over the web. Anyone know if 'post goes post holder goes' is correct? My employer states that this reason is being applied consistently and that is all that matters.


Also there were new roles available in the new structure. At my grade my old job jigged around a little with some work passed out to others to free up time for extensive travel both within the UK and internationally - an average of 2 to 3 days travel per week. My boss knew that with 3 children and a husband who travels for work that I would be unable to commit to this and so I haven't applied. Prior to this there was only the requirement to attend one international conference a year for 3 days, which I did attend. Anyway guess what, yep you got it - my single childless maternity replacement got my 'new' role. I am still waiting for the figures that show the changes to my role were necessary and justified.


There was another job at my grade, more office based and so I expressed interest in this on the condition that I was given my current 2 days a week working at home (I do full time, 3 days in office and 2 at home each week). They have refused to carry over my existing terms and conditions saying as my current role being made redundant they don't have to do this and that the role isn't suited to it but they could stretch to perhaps 2 to 3 days a month at home.


I haven't actually gone back in after I was due back 11 Jan but have been signed off by doc with work related stress and anxiety due to all above - there is even more going on a flexible working request filed before all this started was treated illegally and I have put in a grievance against my boss for sexual discrimination, bullying and harassment re the way he treated me before I went on mat leave.


I am now due to go in for a meeting on Tues at which I am highly likely to be given my official notice of redundancy.


Any pointers on what I can say to them re how badly I have been treated would be greatly welcome. I do have rather colourful private rantings that much as I would like to say are probably not appropriate and so was thinking more along the lines of legal argument.


I have spoken with ACAS and will call them again before the meeting and I am in a Union who are rubbish at responding to emails and who I think are preoccupied with BA staff and postmen rather than little old me on my own - although they have sent me a form to complete once I get my redundancy notice which will help them decide whether or not I have a case for an industrial tribunal.


It is all so draining ...

Oh - so sorry to hear this. My situation was a little different as I was made redundant a few months after returning to work, but it just sucks!


I did some online research, and it all gets very confusing, but in the end I spoke to a couple of the 'no win, no fee' employment lawyers to see if I had a case. There was one in London Bridge I remember who was helpful. (just do a Google search to find the type of people - they are all there!) That way, you can get advice on your specific case. In my situation, although what they were doing was not strictly correct, the advice I got was that the redundancy package was so good it would be highly unlikely I'd get better at tribunal (plus all the stress etc). So I rose above it, went on to do other things, and the upshot is that now I'm working on a freelance basis - with a much higher day rate - for the same company, but much more on my terms (I choose my days, whether I work at home or in the office etc etc). It really wasn't me, it was the restructure, and my old boss is really pleased I'm back too.


Its a cliche, but this could well be the best thing to happen to you!


Good luck x

Sian - thanks I put a post on mumsnet which has really taken off and interesting to see varying people coming down on either side. Given me pointers as to what I may come up against.


Ladywotlunches - I agree my best position is to negotiate a good settlement and work on a freelance basis once the dust settles.


I can see loads have read this post but few commented. It is a sorry tale of woe and really comes down to legal argument.


Have had some helpful PMs from a couple of supportive forumites.


Thanks to all and I will let you know how it pans out.


In the meantime we are set to enjoy the wee ones 1st birthday today with a birthday tea.

As an initial step (before contacting an employment lawyer) you could try contacting the CAB. (Citizens Advice Bureau). My mum used to volunteer for them, and they had people who had done quite a lot of training in this kind of area, so could advise on unfair dismissal and so on. I don't know where the nearest one is, and I imagine it wouldn't be a fun trip, but it would be free.

Just realised that your meeting was today. Hope you were pleasantly surprised.

Thanks to all. I did pay to see a lawyer in the middle of all this who provided some excellent pointers but things have moved on dramatically since. Cost me ?250 +VAT and he wanted a down payment of a further ?1,000 against further consultation so I stepped away from that. Did get my official redundo notice today and garden leave for the 12wks notice I am supposed to do - the only saving grace in the middle of all this. Anyway now I have my formal notice I can pursue through house insurance legal cover and my union if they are able to step up a gear. I see a couple of people have mentioned the CAB - I have looked at their website in the past and it is so draining trying to work out which office I am entitled to attend and at what time - they are v. restrictive but will try harder down that line now. ACAS also wanted me to call back when officially redundant so plenty of avenues to follow but not tonight.


When got home tonight was greeted by my brood (3 daughters) waving a big bunch of flowers and welcoming to my new role as a full time Mum. Mr TP cooking my fav scallops - it is good to be home. Still some choc b'day cake left from little one's 1st b'day yesterday too.


x

Mr TP - so lovely to hear your family are looking after you so well! Its really difficult to do (I tried) but if you can, make the most of this enforced gardening leave to enjoy life! I think that this means you still have 3 months to bring any claims, as you're still officially employed. I also still think the no win no fee option might be one to follow - I was also skeptical of this approach, but wasn't even as sure as you were to want to pay the initial ?250 to a lawyer. And like you say, the CAB is so complicated!! Landau Zeffert Weir were the guys I contacted: http://www.redundancyhelp.co.uk/legaladvice.htm. And also Mundays, I think (though not sure on that one http://www.mundays.co.uk/docs/people/employment.htm)


Onwards and upwards!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...