Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For anyone interested in the government's proposals to change the rules on upward extensions, I have attached a link:


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/501191/Consultation_on_Upward_Extensions_in_London.pdf


Deadline for responses 15 April 2016

Thanks Noelwd for posting that.


I wonder if Southwark Council planning officers, or Planning Committee members, will read it. It includes a reminder that they are supposed to follow the London Plan.


?1.14 Boroughs? local development documents have to be ?in general conformity? with the London Plan, which is also legally part of the development plan, and in accordance with which a planning application must be determined in any part of London, unless there are material planning reasons why it should not.?


There have been a series of 4 storey approvals in East Dulwich, within the Suburban Zone, which the London Plan Policy 3.4 (and Table 3.2) Defines as 2-3 storeys. The density in those approvals accordingly exceeds the London Plan Policy. In each case, the officers report makes no mention of that Policy even when it is specifically cited by objectors.


Two of those recent approvals are for upward extensions, a fourth storey to an existing building ? Crown House and the former Iceland building. I think that neither would qualify for consideration under the new proposal.


?2.9 We are proposing a new permitted development right in London to allow additional storeys to be built on an existing building, up to the height of an adjoining roofline.?


The Crown House addition was described as a ?third floor?, and was approved by officers. Within days the 4 storey height was cited by officers as a precedent to justify 4 storeys for the nearby Crystal Palace Road factory site. In each case officers made no mention of London Plan Policy 3.4.


I wonder if Southwark Council will contribute to the consultation. Perhaps to share experience over the former Iceland site.


?2.4 We would welcome views from developers and local planning authorities on their experience of securing planning permission for this type of development, and what the key considerations were in developing and implementing their proposals to build upwards.?


MarkT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't answer your question. But on them generally: it's changed hands in the last year or so, I think. I paid £35 for interior and exterior and they did a crap job. I'll go to the one on Herne Hill (or just do it myself if health allows) next time.
    • Aria came round to fix my tub drain when I'd messed up the seal. Came within hours, fixed the tub, and ran a bath to make sure it was okay. Here's where the fun starts. While he was over, I asked him questions about the rest of the plumbing round the house. I had just moved into a Victorian home that was previously being rented. Unsurprisingly, we found another leak in the tub and a drip in the kitchen tap.  He came back the next day to put a better pipe in my bathtub and replace the kitchen sink. Painstakingly figured out how to replace the hard-to-access kitchen sink without cutting through the wood panel with the help of his builder friend, Mark. Answered all my questions and clearly knew his stuff. All this right before Christmas holidays! 
    • Was that the one where you put a coin in and it squirted water at you? what was the name of the one in hanway street - whatever you ordered it came on a segmented tray like you get in prison (I imagine). Prices were a steal. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...