Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have just passed the aftermath of a collision between a P13 bus and a motorcyclist on Barry Rd - the bike and rider were on the ground with emergency services attending.


The bus was stationary advanced across Barry Rd heading in the direction of Lordship Lane. The bike and rider were just in front of where it had stopped.


I have no idea of the cause of the accident but it is on the very junction which I recently posted about ( see elsewhere on forum)


One possible scenario is that the bike rider was coming down Barry Rd towards Peckham Rye .. that the bus driver's view of the traffic to his left was obscured by white vans?


That said - when I passed the same junction an hour and half earlier the two white vans normally regularly parked in that vicinity were not near the junction?


Conclusion for increasing future level of safety: erase the white diagonal lines and paint some yellow lines in Barry Rd at that junction.

I too went by this accident last night about 9pm on my way home. It was a chilling scene. I could see a motor bike and a helmet under the front wheels of the P13 bus. I hope the motor cyclist is not too seriously injured.

This is a difficult junction to cross when using Underhill Road. It is not helped by the white vans parked close to the junction which impede the view along Barry Road. I have seen a few near misses in the past when vehicles edge out into Barry Road trying to cross this junction. It may well be a case for double yellow lines on all corners of the junction.

I was out with the police in November at this very spot in Barry Road on a speed gun exercise which showed there were a number of drivers ignoring the 20mph speed limit. Speeding may also be a contributory factor that makes this junction less safe. I will see if there is anything that can be done to make this particular junction a lot safer.


Councillor Charlie Smith

East Dulwich Ward Councillor

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re yellow lines - I said that over two years ago,

> when the build-outs were installed.

>

> Apparently long sight lines make traffic speed,

> which is bollocks.



Absolutely, the proposed yellow lines are around two and a half car lengths, drivers are going to open up and then shut it down in that space? Longer sightlines give drivers more time to see the situation ahead and slow down for it, and for people, like presumably this poor motorcyclist (hope you enjoy a full recovery), coming towards a junction to see any dangerous drivers entering and react to them.

Barry Road is a long, long road with only three crossings, two of those close together (nearer the Rye end). I have seen motorists speed along there at more than 40mph, often not slowing down for the zebra at Goodrich Road. Take care!

Charlie Smith Wrote:

I will see if there is anything that can be

> done to make this particular junction a lot

> safer.

>

> Councillor Charlie Smith

> East Dulwich Ward Councillor


It doesn't take a genius to see this junction is dangerous. Why does it appear to be beyond the wit of whoever plans these to have a bit of foresight? Will someone have to die for something to be done?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 info@jkec.net Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
    • The contact email for the Major Works Team: majorworks@southwark.gov.uk
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...