Jump to content

Victorian French Burr Walnut Double Bed ? ?220


Recommended Posts


See attachment. More photos on http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Victorian-French-Burr-Walnut-Double-Bed-/262355443732


Description

We bought this beautiful, comfortable bed two years ago from a local antique dealer;

and it has served us well but we are modernising so it no longer suits our bedroom.

Includes:


Headboard with inlay and brass decoration

Solid wood bed frame

Wooden slats (modern)

Footboard with inlay decoration (slight scuffing on one of the four brass-tipped feet)


Does not include mattress. Can be very easily assembled / reassembled.

Collection


Handling

We can help you at this end, but you'll need two people at the other end, and you should bring

some blankets to protect the headboards when transporting.

Delivery

Collection only from near The Plough / Dulwich Library. You'll need a small van unless you want

to collect in multiple trips.

Payment

?220. Will accept cash or PayPal via http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Victorian-French-Burr-Walnut-Double-Bed-/262355443732

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...