Jump to content

Advice please - overcharged by electrician


Recommended Posts

We have a good electrician who we have worked with for about five years but recently something happened that had left me pretty annoyed. I asked our electrician to come by to move a plug socket in the kitchen fairly urgently. He came the following week. We hadn?t agreed a price. I was at home but upstairs with our tiny baby pretty much the whole time. He turned up with another electrician and my understanding is that they installed the plug very quickly, perhaps within an hour. My husband was liaising with the electricians. It turns out that rather than leaving when they had done the plug they asked him if there were any more jobs that needed doing while they were there. They ended up moving some light switches and installing some lamps. I then got an invoice for ?600. I queried this with the electrician and he said he billed me for two electricians for a whole day. I am upset about this as I feel taken advantage of. I wasn?t available on the day yet I am the one who is now expected to pay for all of this, and ultimately I only asked for a plug socket to be installed which took one person less than an hour. I really think it?s unreasonable to be slammed for an invoice for ?600 and that the electrician has kind of taken advantage of a chaotic post-baby household. What should I do?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did your husband not agree a price for the extra work ?

Ultimately if they asked if anything else needed doing and your husband said yes then a verbal contract was technically made to proceed with the work and they were then acting under your husbands instructions on what was needed and as a couple you obviously need to accept joint responsibility for any work he requested.


Not a lot you can do except pay the bill unless the quality of the work is substandard or dangerous.

If you are unhappy about it all then look for a new electrician for any future jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd doubt the electrician(s) have a strategy of taking advantage of chaotic / post-baby households, per se.

The pricing may be cheeky, but unless agreed in front it's down to (in this case) the work agreed on the day.

I would question though, how two electricians were needed for what, basically, a handyman could do for ?150 in a day !

Also, if you're long-standing customers of this tradesman, it's bad business for him to take the Mick with you - and perhaps this could be your angle in negotiating his invoice down ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello,

No matter what happened,they should have provided you with quotation and agreed a price with you before carried out the extra job and they should have also agreed with you for the price of initial job and if these two conditions applied that's exploitation and it's unlawful. Contract must be agreed before the commencement of work which included price (invoice), so you can challenge this for a fairer invoice. Please inbox me your number if you don't mind.


Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's a good idea smiley blue , if you or anyone else comes across petitions to end these despicable acts of cruelty to defenceless animals please put on here or start a new thread if you please so we can sign the petition and add our objections to this , I would also like to thank all of you the people for reading these messages and adding your voices to this cruelty,  maybe we can end it 
    • Malumbu, by that measure are police efforts to cut down on anti-social driving by issuing tickets and fines a token effort as well? Surely punitive measures for cyclists breaking the rules will encourage them not to break the rules again? A bit like when you got stopped and taken into the cab of an HGV. The police are currently using that tactic to show those who break the rules cycling that it might lead them to being hit by a lorry due to the driver's having limited vision - the cycling equivalent of a speed awareness course for drivers.    When they stopped you was it because you had broken a rule or was it just more of an education programme and they asked you to take a look and did it change your cycling behaviour in any way? As I said previously there are those who break the rules on cycling out of ignorance (and those out of arrogance) and I am sure they are using HGVs to educate those in the ignorance category and then hitting those in the arrogance category with the PCNs.    
    • Good that PETA is on it but can we add our voices to the fight against this horrible practice? I’m still shocked! A petition maybe? Happy to raise to the RSPCA but don’t want to duplicate efforts. I’ve signed campaigns from RSPCA before which sends it directly to your councillor
    • Yes, I'm aware of that. I believe the brood was five to begin with. However they are almost adult size now so not the prey of rats any longer. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...