Jump to content

Nunhead post - removed.


hadenuff

Recommended Posts

You really need to be more alert AdminMan/Woman....... What about the Telegraph Hill post by "Jeremyweate" on the 2nd Nov.... Come on now tut tut tut. One rule for some & all that. I suggest you ditch the awful sarcasm your posts generally adopt & you spend a good 10 minutes traipsing through the residential section for any sidewinders, aliens & interlopers. Come on AdminMan/Woman you can do it.... The Good Folk of East Dulwich are depending on you.

Is it a bird? Is it a plane?...... No, it's AdminMan/Woman.:)-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Huguenot... that naughty Adminman/woman wrote me a really horrible sarcastic response.... but completely ignored the fact that posts that were sitting right next to mine advertising properties outside of ED were somehow getting the old green light from him/her.

I'm just reacting to the Admistrator's blind eye approach to some & Thought Police approach to others.

Very Kafka-esque if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a new order because people have been advertising rooms, houses, etc. in Nunhead, Peckham and Camberwell for ages. Does that mean the Bellenden/Dog Kennel Hill (SE15 and SE5) area is also off limits? And what about Honor Oak Park etc. Is there some sort of map you could refer to Admin?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Cate,


I couldn't understand it myself. A friend pointed me toward EDF & sure enough there were lots of people looking for accomodation in & around ED. I saw that other posts were from Herne Hill, Sydenham, Peckham, Nunhead, Dulwich Village & Crystal Palace were there so didn't give it a second thought. I was getting good responses but then my post would just dissapear. 3 times it vanished with no polite reason given. I finally emailed admin & got back a terse reply & that I should use the Nunhead Forum. I have reacted by asking him about the other "alien" posts. I am now wondering if it has anything to do with Daisylets who just happen to be a sponsor of this site. The daft thing is my property is on with them, Foxtons & Ludlow Thompson. As I've not had much movement on my property I thought I'd give the EDF a go. So there you have it. I've had my wrists slapped along with a handful of terse & sarcastic emails. I will be uploading these emails for all to see very soon. Why have the creators of this site got so precious about postings or is this particular admin person got an overbloated opinion of themselves.


Regards, Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, it's the same as it has always been.



Don't think it was ever clearly defined before. Some people living in East Dulwich SE22 can't afford to stay here (rent or buy) so naturally look for something nearby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Admin, what is East Dulwich to you?

>

> It's the time, it's the place, it's is the motion.

> East Dulwich is the way we are feeling.


Eh? Can you be a bit more specific.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

OK, look, the forum property section is entitled "Residential property in East Dulwich".

Now Nunhead is not East Dulwich, so a property in Nunhead does not belong in there.

I am not going to allow property from Nunhead, New Cross or Greenwich in that section.


I have no idea what people not being able to afford to live in East Dulwich SE22 has to do with the boundaries.


Gary, you're just being insulting now. You are complaining that a free resource will not let you use their services for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He/She is a bit lame this admin person. He's obviously only responding to ads that get flagged up by other users. I'm wondering just who flagged mine up? This could be the death of EDF.... Nothing worse than an admin person who is doing dodgy under the table deals. Wake up Adminman/woman. What the hell was that daft response to "Cate"? Are you propped up at the bar in the EDT with your laptop?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

God has spoken... You really have let this admin role go to your head.

How have I been insulting? Where do you get your boundaries from?

You certainly can't be selective either.

You can't just pluck them out of mid-air & move the goal posts.

You really do have a very high opinion of yourself.

Must be a damn lonely place to be you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that what this is really all about? You really hate this role don't you?

You are like Frankenstein's creator... you can't look in the mirror can you?


You say in a previous post to Cate, that you will not let people post properties on EDF if they

are in Nunhead, Greenwich or New Cross.

Fair enough, Greenwich & New Cross come under the borough of Lewisham, but Nunhead is actually in Southwark which is just

the other side of Peckham Rye Common.


It is very obvious that as far as the the residential forum is concerned that people are looking for more affordable

means of housing other than ED.


I believe you know you are wrong but can't afford to lose face at this point of proceedings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hadenuff Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is that what this is really all about? You really

> hate this role don't you?

> You are like Frankenstein's creator... you can't

> look in the mirror can you?

>

> You say in a previous post to Cate, that you will

> not let people post properties on EDF if they

> are in Nunhead, Greenwich or New Cross.

> Fair enough, Greenwich & New Cross come under the

> borough of Lewisham, but Nunhead is actually in

> Southwark which is just

> the other side of Peckham Rye Common.

>

> It is very obvious that as far as the the

> residential forum is concerned that people are

> looking for more affordable

> means of housing other than ED.

>

> I believe you know you are wrong but can't afford

> to lose face at this point of proceedings.


--------------------------------------------------


Oooh, i love a good rant,

but i think i've..

had enough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This reads like an article in Gardeners World where Percy Chucker is discussing how he grew his SUV so big just using diesel based fertiliser and regular waywrimg 🤣   But point well made, they are getting bigger which is partly down to safety features that older cars didn't have but also marketing as adverts seen to push SUVs into the public eye. 
    • I highly recommend Phil at Four Paws doors for fitting a pet door. He has recently fitted a new microchip door for me in a very awkward tight spot. He came up with a solution for the problem of how to fit it within the space and supplied the appropriate flap as well as fitting it. The work was done within a couple of days of my initial enquiry. He was very friendly and helpful throughout and did not make a fuss despite having to work hunched under a desk and hitting his head several times!!!  His indepth knowledge was really beneficial and so much better than getting a general handyman to do it.  http://www.fourpawsdoors.co.uk/ m. 07814 406010
    • Cars are getting bigger and heavier (new cars have become so bloated that half of them are too wide to fit in parking spaces designed to the minimum on-street standards. The average width of a new car in the EU and UK passed 180cm in the first half of 2023, having grown an average of 0.5cm each year since 2001). Speed enforcement is also pretty rare in practice and according to DfT stats, under free-flowing traffic conditions, 50% of car drivers exceed the speed limit on 30mph roads. Hopefully we'll see regulation to stop the car bloat arms race, and perhaps moves to use the same geofenced speed limiters deemed essential for electric hire scooters, but not currently SUVs. Would certainly be more effective and cause less noise, pollution and damage than speed bumps. Also the cost gets passed to the manufactures, rather than public authorities.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...