Jump to content

Stirring up racial hatred


sheilarose

Recommended Posts

Dear Admin


(I have tried e-mailing you privately, but I don't have Outlook installed and can't seem to do it.)


I see that you have removed some offensive posts from the Lounge. I was going to copy some of them and report the poster to the police for the offence outlined below. I think perhaps that you should consider doing so yourselves.



Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006


2006 CHAPTER 1


An Act to make provision about offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds.

[16th February 2006]


Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:?.

1Hatred against persons on religious grounds.


The Public Order Act 1986 (c. 64) is amended in accordance with the Schedule to this Act, which creates offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on religious grounds.



(1)This Act may be cited as the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006. .

(2)This Act comes into force on such day as the Secretary of State may appoint by order made by statutory instrument. .

(3)An order under subsection (2) may make? .

(a)such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision, or .

(b)such transitory, transitional or saving provision, .

as the Secretary of State considers appropriate in connection with the coming into force of this Act.

(4)This Act extends to England and Wales only. .


Annotations:



Section 1

SCHEDULEHatred against persons on religious grounds

.


In the Public Order Act 1986 (c. 64), after Part 3 insert?


?Part 3A Hatred against persons on religious grounds


Meaning of ?religious hatred?


29AMeaning of ?religious hatred?.


In this Part ?religious hatred? means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief.


Acts intended to stir up religious hatred


29BUse of words or behaviour or display of written material.


(1)A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. .

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the written material is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and are not heard or seen except by other persons in that or another dwelling. .

(3)A constable may arrest without warrant anyone he reasonably suspects is committing an offence under this section. .

(4)In proceedings for an offence under this section it is a defence for the accused to prove that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the written material displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling. .

(5)This section does not apply to words or behaviour used, or written material displayed, solely for the purpose of being included in a programme service. .

29CPublishing or distributing written material.


(1)A person who publishes or distributes written material which is threatening is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. (my emphasis)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...