Jump to content

Unusual Deposit and Fee Nursery Terms: Piplings


Recommended Posts

Hi,


I've been offered a place at Piplings East Dulwich but a couple elements of their terms of condition jump out at me as strange. I was hoping if you could tell me how these compare to the other nurseries in the area:


1. There is a 700GBP acceptance deposit that they keep in general operating fund until you leave and is not applied to your fees once you start. Given fees are paid in advance the fact that they hold on to such a large deposit seems strange and also the fact that its not held in escrow but in the general fund and therefore can be used by the nursery seems to put parents at risk if the nursery gets into financial trouble.


2. If the manager decides your child isn't suitable for the nursery for any reason, they expect you to pay two months worth of fees after you've been kicked out. They call this fees in lieu of notice (typical notice if a parent wants to terminate is 8 weeks, which also seems long).


Any feedback on how these terms and conditions compare to other nurseries in the area would be great as they strike me as a bit cheeky!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are at Little Unicorns in Canary Wharf and those seem more punitive than their terms. They do have two months notice to leave, but to be honest since it would take a good 4-6 weeks to arrange alternative childcare I'm not super worried about that.


I am not a lawyer but I suspect that them demanding 2-month's fees in lieu of notice after kicking out your kid would be unenforceable under the Consumer Rights Act.


My biggest concern would about giving them an unsecured interest free loan of ?700 for 3-4 years!


It might be worth speaking to Trading Standards or Citizen's Advice to get their view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That all sounds highly irregular. Our lovely old nursery, Blossoms, had nothing like that (this is going back a bit so maybe it's different now but definitely not when we used it). The one we briefly used before - which shall remain nameless (not Piplings) - had more dodgy T&Cs, though still not as bad as these. And actually it turned out to be a rather weird place and I think the T&Cs were a sign of that.


I would say trust your instincts. It certainly doesn't sound reasonable to me and I'd worry about what it says about how the place is managed. I know this probably isn't what you want to hear, and God knows it's hard to find reliable childcare, but you're going to be dealing with these people day in and day out and you want to feel that it's a nice, straightforward, fair organisation.


Be interesting to hear from anyone who has kids at Piplings...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...