Jump to content

Art Deco architecture in East Dulwich


Recommended Posts

Not art deco, but interesting none the less. It was a commercial building designed by the architect John Outram in 1987. Outram is still very much a maverick polemicist in the profession and has designed some truly remarkable buildings (look up The Judge Institute of Management Studies in Cambridge). It certainly wasn't one of his best, but it probably had more thought and passion put into it than a thousand other 'light industrial units' around the country.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old warehouse next to swimming pool




Hairdressers' warehouse shop doesn't look Art Deco



Not sure which one John is referring to - he knows his architecture so maybe he's thinking about something else.


-----

incidentally, the "back to the future" feature of Google maps also shows the old Monkey Puzzle tree which was a favourite of my son. It was overwhelmingly big for that front garden ...)


Link to comment
Share on other sites

They would struggle to put together something uglier and less in keeping with the area. Not that I suppose that matters to the developers. As for the hair products emporium, it was originally a Victorian era stables with the subsequent addition of some WW2 bomb damage, as with much of the area. Not art deco. But still lovelier than what is being proposed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understand what people mean when they complain new-builds aren't "in-keeping" with the area. Are we talking about architectural style? Surely nobody is advocating mock-Victorian buildings. Or are we talking more about the height of the building?


As it goes, I think the new flats look quite smart - as does the leisure centre next door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The site was 203-205 Crystal Palace Road.


The photograph from 2008 that Mike found was the earliest I have seen.


The abused building has still has sufficient diagnostics.


If anyone has an earlier photo, or took a destruction in progress photo, I would like to see it/them.


There is still a standing similar building at 6-12 Grove Vale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have photos of this site from the 1990s (I am not going to dig them out and digitise them, that would be a project in itself to trawl through my attic) however the facade has not changed since 1990 when I moved nearby.

The only change in appearance has been the endless cycle of graffiti / over painting.

Nevertheless, I think 'art deco' is an overly genuine description of what was there until a few weeks ago !


Currently the site looks like this (see photo attached).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I never understand what people mean when they

> complain new-builds aren't "in-keeping" with the

> area. Are we talking about architectural style?

> Surely nobody is advocating mock-Victorian

> buildings. Or are we talking more about the height

> of the building?

>

> As it goes, I think the new flats look quite smart

> - as does the leisure centre next door.


It's not all about design bacaus I don't mind the design - it's the cutting corners.


New flats need some decent quality - chipboard floorboards in the bathroom now damp shredded wheat in mine :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John - do you mean Badminton House on Grove Vale? I'd assumed it was post-war, particularly because it doesn't seem to feature on the 1938 OS map (which shows only the outline of the new roads).


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much Art Deco about Domino's Pizza! And it's been renovated and altered so much I'm guessing just the external brickwork and perhaps roof is all that remains of the original. When I first knew it, it consisted of three separate shops - was that how it was originally?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

mikeb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Domino's displays neither art nor deco.

> At most, maybe Streamline Moderne?


This morning I was driven around the most obscure of East Dulwich backstreets in search of remnants of Streamline Moderne.


Zilch.


The Grove Vale building seems to be the sole survivor and we should treasure it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No curved edges



This book:


https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bombay-Art-Deco-Architecture-1930-1953/dp/8174364471/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1497254444&sr=8-1&keywords=bombay+art+deco


is good on the absence of curves on the most prestigious of art deco buildings.


You s should be able to borrow it from Southwark Libraries.


The afterward by Abha Lambak explains the book was partly put together to support a World Heritage Site listing for the Bombay "Art Deco Cluster!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The book isn't shown on Southwark Libraries catalogue and the link you included shows the book currently to be out of print but as an observation only, and probably a very superficial observation at that, India has a long tradition of assimilating other cultural influences to create something uniquely Indian.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...