Jump to content

The Family Room Discussion

Chat about schools, parental issues and advice, kids activities...


🧑‍🏫  Are you looking for or offering tutoring? Please post in the Tutors & Coaching board instead.

🤱 Need a nanny, babysitter or other childcare help? Ask in our Nanny & Childcare Services board.

📅 Are you hosting or looking for local events for children? Check out our Events Calendar.


19,810 topics in this forum

    • 14 replies
    • 2.9k views
    • 13 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 4 replies
    • 604 views
  1. Getting dry at night...

    • 12 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 10 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 0 replies
    • 407 views
    • 4 replies
    • 546 views
    • 0 replies
    • 581 views
    • 0 replies
    • 532 views
    • 0 replies
    • 100 views
    • 69 replies
    • 5.1k views
    • 3 replies
    • 676 views
    • 1 reply
    • 404 views
    • 12 replies
    • 2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 355 views
    • 3 replies
    • 964 views
    • 3 replies
    • 617 views
    • 2 replies
    • 615 views
    • 1 reply
    • 417 views
  2. CH4 seeks property lovers!

    • 0 replies
    • 106 views
    • 2 replies
    • 654 views
  3. Catchment Area Question

    • 7 replies
    • 3.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 399 views
  4. Captured on the Rye

    • 3 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 3 replies
    • 3.1k views
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...