Request a Tradesperson
Need a job done? Require a plumber, builder, gardener...? Ask in here!
Subforums
-
- 801
- posts
-
- 723
- posts
41,576 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 294 views
-
- 0 replies
- 309 views
-
- 1 reply
- 604 views
-
- 1 reply
- 152 views
-
- 1 reply
- 155 views
-
- 7 replies
- 537 views
-
- 2 replies
- 368 views
-
- 3 replies
- 378 views
-
- 2 replies
- 671 views
-
- 0 replies
- 249 views
-
- 0 replies
- 317 views
-
- 0 replies
- 274 views
-
- 0 replies
- 270 views
-
- 0 replies
- 243 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 310 views
-
- 1 reply
- 376 views
-
- 0 replies
- 303 views
-
- 1 reply
- 370 views
-
- 0 replies
- 410 views
-
- 2 replies
- 358 views
-
- 0 replies
- 634 views
-
- 0 replies
- 87 views
-
- 0 replies
- 76 views
-
- 0 replies
- 258 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it. What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories'). But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. -
You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”. Then you call me pathetic. I’m not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense. But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect -
I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women. Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic.
-
To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers. A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
-