What's on in East Dulwich
Playing a gig? Holding a fair? Spread the word about it here.
Check out our brand new Events Calendar. An organised version of What's on in East Dulwich.
Event hosts - please also add your events to the calendar.
13,524 topics in this forum
-
- 9 replies
- 997 views
-
- 0 replies
- 467 views
-
- 0 replies
- 513 views
-
- 2 replies
- 534 views
-
- 0 replies
- 591 views
-
- 5 replies
- 715 views
-
- 1 reply
- 665 views
-
- 0 replies
- 450 views
-
- 2 replies
- 627 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 496 views
-
- 0 replies
- 505 views
-
- 1 reply
- 585 views
-
- 0 replies
- 523 views
-
- 1 reply
- 440 views
-
- 0 replies
- 537 views
-
- 0 replies
- 459 views
-
- 0 replies
- 480 views
-
- 0 replies
- 576 views
-
- 0 replies
- 646 views
-
- 1 reply
- 516 views
-
- 1 reply
- 508 views
-
- 0 replies
- 451 views
-
- 1 reply
- 512 views
-
- 0 replies
- 573 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
By first mate · Posted
@Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given, I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners. -
Malumbu, if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone he apparently did not give them any kind of warning d) a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post? f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming. -
I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy Louisa.
-