For Sale & Items Offered
Sell or give away your articles
Rules for Selling Items on East Dulwich Forum
Only goods available for collection in SE22 and surrounding areas of South London may be listed for sale on this forum board.
Goods sold via EDF must be legal, safe, accurately described and fit for purpose.
The following items are not allowed to be sold or given away via the forum:
- Animals
- Tobacco
- Knives and other weapons
- Adult goods
Ensure your thread title accurately describes what you are selling. Please put the price of the item in the thread title where possible, e.g. "Leather Sofa - £50".
If you have a big list of similar items to sell at once (e.g. a garage sale) then please put them all in one thread. Do not create more than 3 topics per day per account.
Where possible, please attach a photo, or a link to a shop where the item can be purchased. To upload an image, simply click the 'Choose Files' link below the post text area.
All sale transactions must be organised independently between the buyer and seller. The East Dulwich Forum cannot have any involvement in the transaction and therefore will not take responsibility for disputes (e.g. faulty goods or misleading description). However, accusations of fraud are taken seriously - please report any such occurrences to the forum administrator via the Contact Us button at the bottom of the page.
8,755 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 299 views
-
Sold SOLD £3 FREE P&P OFFERED! BOOK Tin Tabernacles Corrugated Iron Mission Halls, Churches & Chapels of Britain by Ian Smith
- 0 replies
- 204 views
-
Sold £15 FREE P&P OFFERED ! BOOKS Stationary Steam Engines of GB - Victorian & Edwardian British Industrial Architecture
- 0 replies
- 195 views
-
- 0 replies
- 185 views
-
- 0 replies
- 184 views
-
- 0 replies
- 160 views
-
- 0 replies
- 185 views
-
- 0 replies
- 308 views
-
- 2 replies
- 679 views
-
- 0 replies
- 319 views
-
- 0 replies
- 374 views
-
- 0 replies
- 462 views
-
- 1 reply
- 336 views
-
- 0 replies
- 292 views
-
- 0 replies
- 300 views
-
- 0 replies
- 414 views
-
- 0 replies
- 268 views
-
- 0 replies
- 252 views
-
- 0 replies
- 361 views
-
- 0 replies
- 337 views
-
- 0 replies
- 353 views
-
- 0 replies
- 343 views
-
- 0 replies
- 278 views
-
- 1 reply
- 418 views
-
- 0 replies
- 261 views
.thumb.jpeg.04e709db1ae8916dac193281fe9870c0.jpeg)
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url] -
By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted
This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing". -
@Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒 -
Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
-