For Sale & Items Offered
Sell or give away your articles
Rules for Selling Items on East Dulwich Forum
Only goods available for collection in SE22 and surrounding areas of South London may be listed for sale on this forum board.
Goods sold via EDF must be legal, safe, accurately described and fit for purpose.
The following items are not allowed to be sold or given away via the forum:
- Animals
- Tobacco
- Knives and other weapons
- Adult goods
Ensure your thread title accurately describes what you are selling. Please put the price of the item in the thread title where possible, e.g. "Leather Sofa - £50".
If you have a big list of similar items to sell at once (e.g. a garage sale) then please put them all in one thread. Do not create more than 3 topics per day per account.
Where possible, please attach a photo, or a link to a shop where the item can be purchased. To upload an image, simply click the 'Choose Files' link below the post text area.
All sale transactions must be organised independently between the buyer and seller. The East Dulwich Forum cannot have any involvement in the transaction and therefore will not take responsibility for disputes (e.g. faulty goods or misleading description). However, accusations of fraud are taken seriously - please report any such occurrences to the forum administrator via the Contact Us button at the bottom of the page.
147,489 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 374 views
-
- 0 replies
- 346 views
-
- 0 replies
- 240 views
-
- 3 replies
- 285 views
-
- 0 replies
- 264 views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 375 views
-
- 0 replies
- 280 views
-
- 5 replies
- 623 views
-
- 0 replies
- 257 views
-
- 0 replies
- 275 views
-
- 0 replies
- 405 views
-
- 1 reply
- 254 views
-
- 0 replies
- 279 views
-
- 0 replies
- 285 views
-
- 1 reply
- 358 views
-
- 0 replies
- 325 views
-
- 2 replies
- 250 views
-
- 4 replies
- 852 views
-
- 0 replies
- 275 views
-
- 0 replies
- 307 views
-
- 2 replies
- 503 views
-
- 1 reply
- 239 views
-
- 0 replies
- 263 views
-
- 0 replies
- 229 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Thanks P. That sounds like a bargain compared to other horror stories I've heard! -
DD, "Rejoice rejoice. It's a pity he and his fellow clowns were completely annihilated at the ballot box. I mean they were doing so well after all 🙃🙃" At least the economy and unemployment weren't in the mess they are now. What is it, give the public sector a whopping pay increase with no strings attached, double the black hole and then blame it on the last Govt. Give me strength. Rachel from accounts shouldn't be anywhere near the economy. The final straw was increasing employer NI contributions and look how that's worked out. Month on month both inflation and unemployment have risen. Won't be long before inflation and u/e are exceeding 5%, but guess what, They'll blame Sunak and go. Lets have a snap election right NOW, then see how poorly Starmer, Reeves and Rainer do. They're already plotting to get rid of Starmer, and if you think its bad now, you ain't seen nothing yet. Oh and did I mention Starmer wanting to stop Freedom of Speech............................................Normal people can see right through what him and co are doing, great at spending other peoples money, him and co don't have = bankruptcy. We'll just repeat the economic collapse that happened in Greece and wasn't it in Italy as well? -
One of the best of Shakespeare 's plays. I did Othello for A level. Also seen a number of stage and film versions. Is there any specific aspects of the play that is difficult for your daughter to understand? -
@Sue think this is your quote. It wasn't binary, good Vs bad, and Corbyn had a lot of popular support, as evidenced by the previous election. He had aot of good policies, some picked up by others since. He was defeated by a mixture of a right wing press,good targeting the Johnson 'Get Brexit Done" and for some that Johnson was a funny loveable rogue/fool/liar/philander/opportunist. I wouldn't see choosing the perceived least worst candidate out of the two major parties as being "good sense'. We imagine that Corbyn would have been terrible, but we don't know. He would have taken a stronger line against Israel in Gaza, not sucked up to Trump nut on Russia? Would the UK be better for that?
-