Jump to content

Middle class tossers etc


????

Recommended Posts

i hate to say it, but that doesnt work as a geek joke DF.


try


class Upper():

method attitude() return "I look down to Middle and Lower"


class Middle(Upper):

method overrides attitude() return "I look up to Upper and down to Lower"


class Lower(Middle):

method overrides attitude() return "I look up to Upper and Middle "


catch etc (added geek humour)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I was waiting for a response from el pibe :)

> >

> > It was to demonstrate that any Object of the

> > Lower class

> > could access anything that the Middle or Upper

> > classes could.

> >

> > Everything is achievable..

> >

> > Could of been an in joke. but was not meant to

> be

> > so.

>

> That depends on the protection level of your data

> members, depending on the language you use.


Python variables do not need to be defined Private: or Public:


Please don't get too deep... I'm very new to python. :)


It was all El Pibe's fault.


Foxy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disappointed. I assumed that this was a thread for middle class tossers like me to congregate. Obviously we have lots of middle class tosser venues to meet up in on and off Lordship Lane. Perhaps we could have our own social networking site so we wouldn't have to mix with some of you oinks.


Or alternatively just relable this site as .middleclasstosser.co.uk - I am sure most of us will fit the bill


Just checked, nobody has that domain name yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can recommend Leon from Electrical Initiative hands down. He’s efficient, always gives a specific time slot, is punctual and does a great job. He’s been on my contact list for the last eight years, and any electrical work he is the first person I call.
    • I remember some old threads about this and have just checked. Use the search function, type in half Houses and there are 3 old threads. 2 of them have specific titles, freehold and water supply.
    • 57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) It seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months?  You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says  “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions (where they are actual questions). You ducked and deflected my two for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘have you stopped beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle. 🙄    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...