Jump to content

Going green isn't easy


Spartacus

Recommended Posts

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sourcing the materials for the batteries also does

> considerable environmental harm, not to mention

> using an obscene amount of groundwater.


That is very true..


The materials used in batteries are harmful to the environment. The mining and processing of metals such as lithium, copper, and nickel requires much energy and it can release toxic compounds.


Electric cars need to be charged (By Electricity) which needs to be generated. More Power Stations.

You cannot get more energy out than you put in.


Much of the Pollution from cars come from Tyres and dust form Brake Cylinders..

A 20 MPH speed limit means constant breaking and cars being closer together.

With slower moving traffic the pollution is more concentrated and not distributed.


Electric cars do Nothing to ease congestion.


Cheap public transport is the real answer. But the government is NOT really looking for a Real answer.


DulwichFox


ETA.. in 5+years time we will be faced with the problem of disposing of Millions of toxic batteries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got to question where we went wrong environmentally


In the past we had electric trams and electric trolley buses that were abandoned due to the issues of overhead line maintenance and inability to do a diversion if the road was blocked, yet now they are looking to introduce electric busses


We used to have milk delivered by electric floats in glass bottles but now it's all in plastic containers from the shops which people often drive polluting cars to get there.


Lemonade came in deposit paid recyclable bottles (and tasted better)


Local Fruit and veg was sold by greengrocers and if it was out of season it wasn't flown in


Local shops served goods in brown paper bags and people took shopping bags or trolleys when shopping, none of this packaged in plastic and then packed into a plastic bag nonsense


Early supermarkets often had a pile of boxes you could pick up to pack your items into to if you didn't have bags with you


We had windmills and watermills to power industry and now people are excitable about wind farms (either for or against) and hydro or wave powered solutions.


Because of government decisions to cut train and bus services people were driven to use cars


Shops were on every street so you were able to walk to them and not have to drive to the supermarket to get a loaf of bread.


And kids walked or cycled to a school near their home rather than travelling miles to get to a school that has the best results.


We all used a land-line that didn't need charging every 12 hours and only one television in the house so electricity usage was minimum as there were only a few devices connected to the mains.


Tablets were awful tasting things from the doctor ! and most things were cured with a dose of cod liver oil and not antibiotics.


People bought what they needed on a regular (often daily) basis and made home cooked meals , not ready meals which reduced food waste, helped keep obesity to a minimum and families ate together.


I sometimes think progress and big companies selling us a flawed dream has come at a cost that we are only now starting to realise.


Maybe we should look back at our past to help design our future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And women didn't do paid work (mostly) and spent all their time at home cooking, cleaning, knitting and sewing ...


And there weren't washing machines or hoovers ....


And people died because there were no antibiotics. My mother lost her mother who died of peritonitis when she (my mother) was two years old.


It wasn't all wonderful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one said it was wonderful Sue, I'm simply questioning why we moved away from so many environmentally friendly practices to a point where we are now worried about major impacts of our consumerism on the environment.


The antibiotic reference was in context of people stupidly taking them now for conditions that can't be treated by them thus causing resistance and potential loss of effective drugs and it wasn't a dig at antibiotics as a genuine medical treatment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...