Jump to content

Rat running - discuss


intexasatthe moment

Recommended Posts

In my mind driving from a to b by a preferred route is a normal and acceptable activity .The route may be chosen because it's senic ,goes past a property of interest ,or maybe because it avoids congestion on other roads .


Somehow driving via a short cut ,avoiding main through routes has become an activity to be criticised and compared to the activity of rodents .


The constant use of the expression "rat running " which actually seems to mean using fabled "residential "roads with the implication that only residents of those streets should drive up and down them is beginning to grate .


There I feel better for getting that off my chest .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean... "fabled" residential roads?


Are you denying that there's a material difference between A roads and residential back streets?


I'm not criticising as such, I sometimes follow the sat nav down god knows where to bypass traffic, but at the same time I understand the practice is problematic.


The crazy Peckham one way system has created many such routes, with everyone from boy racers to full size coaches driving down narrow residential roads. It feels very dangerous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Are you denying that there's a material difference between A roads and residential back streets?"


The difference is that some roads already carry a great deal more traffic ,both are residential .


I note that you only attach this descriptor to "back" roads .Which is where the fabled comes in ,this area isn't some rural village where children play out on summer evenings .Hoping that it will become like one by trying to force all traffic onto a few roads and describing drivers who use "back" streets as rat runners is a lazy ,knee jerk use of language .


Increasing vehicle movements on an already heavily used road will pollute the air in the samw way that increased traffic on a less well used route .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be people who set their sat nav to 'avoid traffic' because I was in a car with someone and we needed to get to Deptford from Crystal Palace Road.

I usually go straight down Barry Road turn right at the bottom and go straight up to turn left at Brenchley Gardens after the traffic lights.

This sat nav took us around every back street eventually emerging at Ryedale and took 3x as long!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?A? roads were created in the mythical past of the last century. Things have changed a little since then. Housing is denser in such roads. If we are making changes for maximum impact then we should be looking to divert traffic from these densely residential A roads onto roads where large front gardens offer some protection from pollution.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...