Jump to content

Victorian East Dulwich Local History


Recommended Posts

The East Dulwich area has been well researched previously in the excellent books of John Beasley, but as a lockdown hobby, I started some local history research of my own into Lordship Lane and the surrounding areas during the 1800?s. I have found some things hopefully of interest which I would like to share.

For some years, there was a mainly commercial area in Lordship Lane known as ?The Pavement?. This commenced from the corner with Whately Road and extended northwards. In 1881, Nos. 1-8 The Pavement ran from where Bells is now, up to the corner with Bawdale Rd. The respective businesses were as follows: No. 1 (Bells) was a Draper, No. 2: Stationers; No. 3: Cheesemonger; No. 4: Bootmaker, No. 5: Unoccupied, No.6: Oil supplies, No.7: Unoccupied and No. 8 was Victuallers/Wine & Beer Retailer. This is where Franklins is, now numbered at 157 Lordship Lane and the former premises of a Public House named The Victory. The numbering of the Pavement then goes a little awry, but some other businesses in that location were a Baker, Children?s Outfitters, Tobacconist, Butcher and a Coffee House Keeper. There was even a temporary public library there later, before Dulwich College allowed a permanent one to be built further up Lordship Lane.

In the same year of 1881, there was a controversial debate going on regarding who was going to pay for the planned York Stone paving which was to line both sides of the highway to create a new street running from the East Dulwich Hotel (now known as The East Dulwich Tavern) to the Magdala Public House. (The Lordship). This stretch of road was described as a ?standing disgrace to the Parish and impassable in places?. People had purchased land there, apparently believing that as Lordship Lane was an old Parish road and Highway, it would be maintained by the Vestry of Camberwell as in the past. But there was an argument that the increase of buildings had in effect turned it into a ?new road? and it was thus the responsibility of the building owners to fund the work. It would appear that particular argument eventually won the day and the poor old Ratepayers had to cough up!

In 1884, the East Dulwich Hotel (EDT) was up for sale after the death of its owner, one James Swain Gurney. Although licenced as the East Dulwich Hotel, it was known affectionately as ?Gurney?s?. Described as commandingly situated on the corner of Lordship Lane and Goose Green, it came with a livery stable adjoining. The immediate area is described as being, only a short time back, one of mainly fields and market gardens with Gentleman?s mansions in grounds of great area. Now with those demolished, there were ?thousands of middle-class properties? built upon the grounds. Its excellent location was also admirably placed for Peckham Rye, well patronised by cricketers, and Champion Hill Railway Station (East Dulwich Station).

And finally, a great day for Lordship Lane on 17th July 1897, when the Prince of Wales, (later King Edward VII) accompanied by his wife and daughter, was transported in an open carriage on his way to Lewisham, to open a new Fever Hospital. In the neighbourhood of the East Dulwich Hotel streamers were arranged across the roadway and ?in all directions the tradesmen and private residents had made a brave attempt to give outward and visible expression to their loyalty?. The Pavement in Lordship Lane, described as being a busy centre of commercial activity, presented a most ?animated appearance with flags, banners and Japanese lanterns all tended to impart colour and picturesqueness to the scene.? There were ambitious efforts at decorations close to the Magdala Tavern and the Fire Station and a large canvas bearing the words ?Camberwell Greets You?.

I hope if people like me enjoy local history, they will find it interesting. There is a lot more out there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's very sad that the Victorian houses have been so vandalised by ugly extensions , paving over gardens and awful window replacements. Many of the houses were artisans' cottages.

I very much doubt if the people who have so destroyed the heritage of the architecture have big families and so do not need the loft conversions etc...but in about 20 years when their 2 children have left home they will apply for HMOs or conversions to 2 or more flats and live off the proceeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>. Many of the

> houses were artisans' cottages.



When I bought my small terraced house nearly thirty years ago, it was described in the estate agent's blurb as an "artisan's cottage."


I thought it was just estate agent language to make the house sound more attractive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Sue. Most of the houses in East Dulwich were built with those employed in clerical jobs in the centre of London in mind, able to travel to their jobs easily and quickly on the newly built railways. East Dulwich wasn?t a hub of cottage industries.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks do much Fizzy for posting this, it's so very interesting.

Do you have any more history on these 2?


I remember the carpet shop was Dourofs carpet shop and previously an estate agents and before that an antiques shop back in the 60s and before that a florists and a photography studio before that.


Where Olivelli is now years ago 'Haywoods' handbag shop was run by Maureen Haywood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best book on East Dulwich is the Victorian Suburb by Prof H J Dyos. It tells you about its development;how the builders were organised and how it was funded. Solicitors were the nexus between those with spare cash and enterprising tradesmen. Its a long time since I read it. He taught me back in the 1970s.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...