Jump to content

Irresponsible, illegal (?) public events


Recommended Posts

The junction of Calton Avenue, Court Lane and Dulwich Village was temporarily closed off under emergency measures on the basis this would help the fight against Covid by allowing social distancing.


However, an organisation has used this opportunity to promote a series of concerts and other events in the closed off area. I have seen a video showing about 70 people there last weekend which, in my opinion, is totally irresponsible and also seems to contravenes government guidelines (if not laws).


Is there a department in the council responsible for ensuring compliance with Covid regulations and to whom we can report this anti-social behaviour?




See https://www.friendsofdulwichsquare.co.uk/ for past and future events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really? Doesn't look any different to people in

> the park or on the beach.

>

> I would say the road closure is absolutely

> ridiculous though. Going to be total gridlock from

> September.

It's a difficult one to call because yes it is just like going to the park/beach but the difference here is that as organised events it is encouraging people to group together... hence irresponsible of those organising it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remembering that you?ve previously said you are part of One Dulwich, this post and your views are not surprising.


It smacks of sour grapes.


I went to the first event and it was great. Very much the opposite of the division One Dulwich refers to. Elderly people bringing chairs with them to sit for a short while and enjoy lovely music, whilst the cafe was doing a roaring trade of ice creams.


slarti b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The junction of Calton Avenue, Court Lane and

> Dulwich Village was temporarily closed off under

> emergency measures on the basis this would help

> the fight against Covid by allowing social

> distancing.

>

> However, an organisation has used this opportunity

> to promote a series of concerts and other events

> in the closed off area. I have seen a video

> showing about 70 people there last weekend which,

> in my opinion, is totally irresponsible and also

> seems to contravenes government guidelines (if not

> laws).

>

> Is there a department in the council responsible

> for ensuring compliance with Covid regulations and

> to whom we can report this anti-social behaviour?

>

>

>

> See https://www.friendsofdulwichsquare.co.uk/ for

> past and future events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the stated reasons the junction was closed was to enable social distancing during the pandemic. These events seem to be at odds with that. Another reason was to encourage active travel. People congregating in this manner create an obstacle for both cyclists and pedestrians.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small outdoor socially distanced events are legal surely? If you can go to the pub why can't a few older people sit apart from each other and listen to music outside?


Honestly this is the most mean spirited post since people threatened to report the ice cream shop for legally selling ice cream. We need to be careful but you get the feeling some people aren't happy unless everyone is miserably sitting at home eating their "essential food".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-------------------------------------------------------

those who think they have a 'human right' to drive their car half a mile are intrinsically mean spirited.

I use the term 'human rights; because on the One Dulwich web site one of their supporters uses the phrase :

'the closure of the Village junction is against my human rights"

for goodness sake!!!!

In a few years time using your car for short distance journeys in the city will be frowned on like smoking is now

those who wish to retain this dubious 'right' will stoop to ever lower tactics to fight change, including

try to stop happy, socially distanced, and joyful music events.


Cyclemonkey Wrote:> Small outdoor socially distanced events are legal

> surely? If you can go to the pub why can't a few

> older people sit apart from each other and listen

> to music outside?

>




> Honestly this is the most mean spirited post since

> people threatened to report the ice cream shop for

> legally selling ice cream. We need to be careful

> but you get the feeling some people aren't happy

> unless everyone is miserably sitting at home

> eating their "essential food".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cyclemonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Small outdoor socially distanced events are legal

> surely? If you can go to the pub why can't a few

> older people sit apart from each other and listen

> to music outside?

>

> Honestly this is the most mean spirited post since

> people threatened to report the ice cream shop for

> legally selling ice cream. We need to be careful

> but you get the feeling some people aren't happy

> unless everyone is miserably sitting at home

> eating their "essential food".


They're old and we as a nation don't like the old doing things - it's not seemly.


Imagine if those in care homes started to complain about their lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i*Rate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funny, I though that junction was closed off

> because it was one of the most highly polluted

> junctions in Dulwich?

>

> Bring back the traffic then and stop all this fun

> and music nonsense.

>

> Pip.Pip.


Source of this information?


Also, whilst we accept how busy this junction can get, the work Southwark did 2 years ago made the traffic considerably worse, especially the change of priority to enter Court Lane. That alone created a log jam over the junction and was deliberate IMHO to screw the figures to justify the closure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cyclemonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Small outdoor socially distanced events are legal

> surely? If you can go to the pub why can't a few

> older people sit apart from each other and listen

> to music outside?

>

> Honestly this is the most mean spirited post since

> people threatened to report the ice cream shop for

> legally selling ice cream. We need to be careful

> but you get the feeling some people aren't happy

> unless everyone is miserably sitting at home

> eating their "essential food".


The current guidance https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-outbreak-faqs-what-you-can-and-cant-do/coronavirus-outbreak-faqs-what-you-can-and-cant-do#social-contact-and-events limits gatherings (see section 2) and whilst there are exceptions to the rule of a maximum of 30 people there needs to be a risk assessment in place


However as pointed out in another thread Southwark are not licensing events at the moment so there is a question mark hanging over the legality of the events on the square.


Sadly as seen in Spain, France and locations like Preston and GM, the virus isn't under control yet and it just takes one person to infect a group (remember the wedding in India where the groom infected a whole load of guests)

Whilst the figures are low in Southwark it just takes one infected person regardless how they got it, to see a local spike and we will all be in the news for the wrong reason.


I agree, the pub is just about the same or a higher risk, but as there is a register of attendees then there is the ability to quickly 😏 identify people from a track and trace perspective.


Personally I won't be attending any events on the new square, not just because I believe it's a council pet project that has been forced through without proper consultation, but because I don't want to end up breathing through a tube and suffering post viral side effects (long covid) like so many have

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't put it better Spartacus.


Concern over events like this is not mean spirited, it's easy to write people off as irrational or not to be listened to in that way. It seems like there is much sticking fingers in ears and going La La La happening all around us. And obviously I include the council with their road closure programme in that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they want to organise events in the middle of the road good luck to them.


I think the images that come from it powerfully communicate and resonate why this closure is completely ludicrous, self-serving and benefiting a few of the local (wealthy) residents whilst causing chaos and havoc for everyone else and I don't see anything in the videos they put out that doesn't scream that!


Don't get it banned - it's a very powerful visual metaphor! ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...