Jump to content

brezzo

Member
  • Posts

    190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by brezzo

  1. I also work in a faith school. We've just had LGBT* week with guest speakers from churches, government department and goodness knows how many other areas of society.


    And we've done stuff around female genital mutilation, Islamism, islamaphobia, feminism,importance of voting in a democracy. So yeah, brainwashing but from what I can see most schools, most of the time promote the values of a free and tolerant society.


    (When we are not doing that we are also pretty good at teaching the National Curriculum)


    *Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgendered

  2. Sorry emro, but you have no evidence to support that assertions. You have compared Charter's Gifted & Talented cohort (about 10% of a year group) with all students in private schools. Frankly there are some very ordinary students at Dulwich college and some superbright kids at Charter, so comparing a selection with a whole group is not accurate.


    Personally, as a Charter parent I wish you were correct, but facts do have a habit of getting in the way of a good story.

  3. The A level data is not reliable - there are a number of schools with an A*-B rate higher than 38% that don't show on Telegraph list.


    Regarding gcse data from 2012, big clue on titles -most of these schools are grammars and hence highly selective. To get a better picture, if you go to DFEE website and search for Charter results compared to similar schools nationally, they come 4th. Can't speak for other local schools, but I would think they were also pretty good

  4. Emro,


    this is perhaps not relevant to main thrust of this discussion, but your data is skewiff - you are comparing a select group from Charter, (their GTP group) with all of the kids from Dulwich college, these two groups are not the same. To reach any conclusions, you would have to compare like with like groups. The "average" kid at the College would not probably not get into Charter's GTP group, so comparison does not work. Charter's "value added" is good, but there is no data from private sector for purpose of comparisons

  5. Actually, I think people should be free to spend their money as they choose, and maybe if I had more money I might spend some of it on private education rather than a Dulwich sized mortgage. Some people use their money to buy education for children, others play the postcode lottery, others still get religion. I am not sure that any one is better or worse than another


    But that doesn't mean I close my eyes to the reality of the world. Without turning all Dave Spart,the purpose of the British education system is to maintain the British class system, Eton is a charity in law, but it's not exactly Medecin Sans Frontieres in practice. Turning out 19 prime ministers (will Boris be 20th?), I think makes the point.


    As for Edward Alleyn and the poor of London. Come on! you've got to admit that's long past. The beneficiaries are overwhelmingly from the middle class. As I said before, I don't mind, but the righteousness of posters cuts both ways.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...