Jump to content

Loz

Member
  • Posts

    8,453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Loz

  1. Undisputedtruth Wrote:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    > It's an old Tory divertion tactic: appear to support the disabled in public while cutting their

    > disabled benefits.


    Hooray! Always good to get the old political sloganeering out. I bet if you heard that they had turned down the opportunity to promote the paralympics you'd have stuck the boot in even harder.


    Heads you win, tails you win.

  2. I've been doing Kiva for about a year or so and have totted up 24 loans so far. I think it's great. I relend as the payments come in and lob another US$50 or so into my pot every couple of months.


    We should start an EDF lender team!


    One thing to watch is that there are interest payments made to the local lending organisation (which they keep). You are just stumping up the capital.

  3. ianr Wrote:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    > Is there _any_ word for which you can't find a salacious, possibly spurious, entry in Urban

    > Dictionary? Even Loz and Lozenge. Nul points and own goal.


    I'm always up for a challenge.


    Gooooooooooooooooooaaaalll!

  4. jenniejenjen10 Wrote:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    > any single boys wanting to join the lovely ladies of east dulwich on sunday 18th sept at the

    > palmerston for a delish roast


    Oh boy, if you get any footballers along are they going to be a little confused. And possibly disappointed.

  5. malumbu Wrote:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    > Passed Traf Square today and had the fun of

    > watching the Mayor and PM join in wheelchair

    > tennis. Whilst I can make cheap shots at their

    > expense until the cows come home, two questions:

    >

    > 1. Should they have at least taken their ties

    > off, or probably put some sort of sports casuals

    > on


    Then someone would have criticised them for looking scruffy.


    > 2. Should they have sat in wheelchairs, as able bodied people often do, to experience what it is

    > really like. A confident chuffer I knew was there and said that would have distracted from the two

    > guys partnering them in wheelchairs.


    Then someone would have criticised them for not taking wheelchair sports seriously.


    Really, whatever a politician does (or even most celebrities) they are going to be criticised by someone, somewhere for it.

  6. An interesting couple of ideas from the Guardian...


    Firstly, MM's 320,000 high-rate tax payers contribute 24% of income tax intake. But then consider why the tax may do more harm than good.



    An individual on ?500k per annum will pay ?241k a year Income Tax and Emploees NI - of this ?17.5k is due to the increase from 40% to 50%. The additional income raised is therefore ?17.5k. If one person on ?500k pa leaves the country or retires early we "lose" ?241k tax income.


    Therefore the additional income raised from 14 people (?17.5k x 14 = ?245k) is required to cover the loss from one person leaving/retiring (?241k). So if 1in 15 stops paying the tax by emigrating or stopping working we break even. If 1 in 14 stops we are worse off.


    And if the one who leaves is on ?5m pa then we need shedloads of people "only" on ?500k to cover the loss!!

  7. Chippy Minton Wrote:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    > To be clear, the march wasn't banned because I,

    > the government or anyone else disagreed with the

    > EDL's politics.

    >

    > It was banned because the police feared it would

    > lead to violence and disorder and the government

    > wanted to ensure local communities and property

    > were protected.


    My point exactly. You apply that criteria to *any* march - especially now ones involving students, anti-globalisation protesters or anyone from Tottenham.


    Welcome to the thin end of the wedge.

  8. peterstorm1985 Wrote:

    -------------------------------------------------------


    > What I don't get is why anyone thinks they need to have a party in the small hours? What's wrong with

    > just starting earlier in the day and finishing at a reasonable hour. I can understand that teenagers

    > think it's cool to be up all night but that's only because it's something they've only recently been

    > allowed to do.

    >

    > But grown ups?


    Totally missing the point of a party. Next you'll be suggesting cups of tea and cucumber sandwiches all round.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...