TheArtfulDogger

My social media feeds seem to be showing a lot of people, some famous, some not, who seem to deny certain elements of the pandemic. This morning it was Julia Hartley-Brewer, a talk radio breakfast presenter (no I've never heard of her either) saying "I've said it before and I'll say it again. Jab or no jab lockdown restrictions will never end until we Say 'enough is enough' & tell the govt to give us back our lives. There will *always* be another reason for them to extend the lockdown. This won't end till we say it does" I am sure that the government doesn't want to keep us locked down forever, the financial impact alone is potentially catastrophic, and then people question the reason masks are necessary. I've seen arguments that they are "muzzling" the population and emasculating us all as a form of control. In response hundreds of people are agreeing with her, and she isn't the only feed like this I've seen. Freedom of speech is marvellous, but should dangerous points of view like this be checked and validated ? People who respond in favour are potentially the same mindset as those that stood outside hospitals recently denying covid existed and upsetting medical staff who have come off shift dealing with it, and potentially deaths caused by it. Why are these people hoping to gain ? Do they really believe there is a global conspiracy against them ? and won't they be surprised when the "mother ship" doesn't come down and take them all away (to a human meat processing factory of course)

So Bic is an only child and we are trying to work out who Nic is Well I can reveal the truth (as there's no post till Tuesday now) On a Thursday night, down at the Legion's drag queen night, Nicole ShirtSinger is Bic's stage name as he goes through a routine starting with Please Mr Postman, Signed sealed not delivered, letters that didn't cross in the mail and his/her big finishing number the Postman always rings twice (before leaving a non delivery note) Catch him before it's too late 😎

It's not how we die foxy, it's how we live that's important !

You could try Jh skincare over in Sydenham

What's this Dogs Flashing Local park Oh my...

Get some sausage skins and stuff your own. Thus ensuring you have the right combinations of flavour and texture / meatiness

diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sex banned indoors for Tier 2 couples living > apart, No 10 confirms > > At least Artful will be pleased, dogging is still > legal under Tier 2 rules... Taking my name in vain Diable Although these days with all the road restrictions by time you drive to a car park you are too tired for anything else

Begger me, imitation is a sincere form of flattery but please choose your own identity to stop confusion The above post is nothing to do with me.

The risk is with this thread, as soon as you penetrate deeper into it, it's gone. 😳

Secret Santa The stress of buying a tasteful thoughtful gift for under a fiver (or amount set) for someone you barely know and who won't appreciate it and will regift it to their aunt or uncle who will appreciate it less. I won't miss all of that this year

I really wish you lot would stop scaring people with these stories. Since you started my revenu stream has been badly hit ! "Hello foxy, this is HMRC, you've got errors on your return can you confirm the following security details before I discuss it with you : your mother foxes maiden name, your date of birth and the first 20 letters of your password ?"

The Hill Billy family descend from Dog Kennel Hill in their old jaloppy after drinking enough moonshine to turn them blind just to shout insults at people using the EDF on Ulverscroft road "There's no way of building more cycle lanes or improving bus services (or getting enough room to drive our shack) without restricting the volume of other traffic and the places it can park"

Blah, a consultation is a process to achieve a compromise but without knowing what is acceptable to Peckham vision /Eileen then how do you know when that compromise has been reached? Eileen has a track record for objecting to oppertunities for the town centre but not giving solutions or working with developers. The tram is a classic example, she objected to the terminus and depot being in Peckham on various grounds including that the depot would see shards of metal and sparks in the air of Peckham when they ground the wheels. During that consultation she didn't engage with TfL or cross river to find a compromise and as such Peckham lost the opportunity for an eco friendly transport, jobs, development and inward investment. We all want the best for Peckham but without saying what that is (size, no of properties, unit cost...) then Peckham vision's objections seem to be objections for the sake of it. All I'm asking for is Peckham Vision to actually say what the minimum acceptable option with this development is so that there is a starting point for the consultation.

So the answer I can ascertain from your clever wordsmith answers is, and correct me with an honest answer of what you want from the development if I'm wrong "You don't want what's proposed, you want a consultation but you have no baseline for what you do want" Hardly a visionary Eileen. That approach is liable to result in the developers pulling out with the loss of investment in Peckham at a time when investment is like pixie dust and potentially, with the way retail is heading, leaving what should be an amazing town centre (retail footprint wise) struggling for decades to come. The council will possibly never have funds again for investing in our town centres and I for one would be happier if Peckham Vision lived up to its name and had a real plan for how Peckham should be rather than an aspirational mission statement. Yours Mr. Artful Dogger

I asked what the vision for the development is, not for your mission statement. This lack of clarity over what you want is frankly making me wonder if you are being deliberately stupid, and we all know you're not. So again I ask what is Peckham vision's vision for the Aylesham centre development site ? Of course if you haven't got one, then as I stated before , how will you know when you have reached a point where you are happy with the outcome? And saying its for the consultation process just makes it obvious you haven't got an idea and won't be happy regardless of what's presented. So please give a straight answer to the question as I'm sure other people are just as interested.