Alan Medic

Confused again Mick?

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Tom > > If it was a carnivore campaigning against FG it > might carry more weight (" I eat animal products > but care about how they arrive at the table") > > Your history suggests you are against the > consumption of ALL animal products. So some people > are wary of you and your motives, even if, in this > case, there MIGHT be some merit SJ now that is just RIDICULOUS. What POSSIBLE motive could Tom have in his campaign against FG? Do YOU think he is planning on SECRETLY turning everyone into a VEGAN? How will he do that? Surely it is possible for vegans and carnivores to find SOME common ground when it comes to certain practices such as the PRODUCTION METHODS of FG?

10.0

Is there a purpose in life for cherries? I just don't get them.

ianr's goose is cooked don't you think? He should duck out out of here for a while.

Reminds me of last w/end when I was obstructed by a lady driver doing a 17 point turn!

I reckon ianr was too busy writing down postcodes to see much of the film.

200

Right, please confirm you have started this thread just to wind some people up?

About 10 previous posts would say otherwise.

Read the OP again Loz. Who said anything about a protest or demands? Thomas has every right to encourage people if he so chooses. Where has he issued a threat? You would think HE had done something wrong given the tone of your post.

You might. I doubt the vast majority even think about it.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > aquarius moon Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Tom is trying to educate people. > > That's exactly the problem. > > Almost everybody who eats Foie Gras already knows > what it is, and how it's produced. They don't need > "educating" - they already know the facts, they > just have a different opinion. How do you know that Jeremy?

It's a Palace XI so likely to be their reserves/squad players. They have a home game the night before v premiership opposition.

I suspect you don't mean that maxxi. Anyway I'm not looking for an apology nor to give one. Tom deserves credit for raising this subject and provoking a debate on it.

Ah sod off Frankie. I didn't have time to write an essay. maxxi said bollix first.

Well up yours then!

maxxi wrote Now that is bollix. Tom has been nothing but friendly on this forum and not idiot enough to think he could pull the wool over your eyes regarding his eating habits. Where did he even imply he was not against meat? He may not persuade ED to give up meat but he might have hoped to make an impact on some people regarding FG. You should apologise to him.

One thing that you might not be aware of which I used was the free legal aid which was included in my home insurance policy. Check your policy, if you have one, to see.

Anyone who has visited Borough High Street recently will know that you cannot go south for a part from London Bridge, due to road works. In spite of signs telling cyclists to dismount they still ignore them and tear down the part of the road sectioned off, riding between cones and pedestrians. I'm developing a complete lack of respect for them. They don't seem to respect anything.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Agreed. Portmarknock would be a good test. How about Royal Killarney Golf and Fishing Club?

Agreed. Portmarknock would be a good test.

..............here come the tree huggers............

Not at all. Just clarifying what you didn't.

Dublin, a much smaller place, had 3 majors in 12 months and 3 weeks!