edhistory

How did the contact with the Dog Kennel Hill bat survey people go? John K

Peckham is fortunate in having that compact cluster of seven srt deco buildings of national importance. John K

Where is this East Dulwich? John K

Where is the northern boundary of St John the Evangelist, East Dulwich, parish? John K

Is anyone arranging a collection for a retirement present? John K

MissKing Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > According to this, it's the same property > developer that did the garden centre. They have > bought up the cottages and the road with a view to > develop into shops and flats: > > https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/designation > _of_railway_rise_se22 Who is Charles Lound? What is his source for road ownership? If it is an adopted road owned by Southwark Council the council should have a copy of the legal order. If it is owned by Network Rail (or successor) the Marlin Plan will show the land ownership boundaries. If it is owned by the developer the Land Registry should have details. John K

Kiera, You have NOT named any species. This may help: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-3408 John K

"These wonderful woodlands are home to protected species" Which species are these? John K

This at Haywards Heath: http://www.bluebell-railway.co.uk/bluebell/pic2/wn-2011b/hh_cottage_richardc2593_1oct11h.jpg was demolished in October 2011. Unless someone knows otherwise, ours at East Dulwich are "sole survivors". John K

I thought that Thames Water is now a mandatory statutory consultee. Thames Water will address the impact on the Station Rise sewer. This sewer was originally built between 1865 and 1873 and sized for three small Victorian domestic premises. It may be neccessary for Railway Rise to have a new sewer system with interesting Grove Vale excavations to make the join. Pehaps the non-consultation with Thames Water is an oversight. John K

Sabina Grezda-McArthur is your person if you want to escalate a complaint within the company. She is responsible for overall service delivery performance. http://www.dmchealthcare.co.uk/about-dmc/the-team/ She says she is very good at troubleshooting: http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/sabina-grzeda-mcarthur/52/925/863 John K

fleur Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Both cemeteries are part of the London > Green Chain Walk and Camberwell Old Cemetery is a > Grade 1 Site of Borough Importance for Nature > Conservation. These wonderful woodlands are home > to protected species Which are the protected species? John K

I might spend a few quid (via Companies Houese, not this URL) to see the accounts of Independent Practitioners Limited: http://www.dellam.com/04407719-INDEPENDENT%20HEALTH%20PRACTITIONERS%20LIMITED.html John K

Very serious accident at junction of Lordship Lane and East Dulwich Grove. John K

LondonMix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > While these are unique to Dulwich, > they aren't unique in London and don't have any > specific merit when compared to the numerous > railway cottages that exist from what I > understand. I've not been able to locate any other London examples. Can you help? John K

@woodwarde and scootingover have asked about the East Dulwich Society. Best to ask pugwash. John K

This charity? http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfCharities/FinancialHistory.aspx?RegisteredCharityNumber=1107737&SubsidiaryNumber=0 With four employees having salaries over ?100k. John K

Siduhe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I would guess it's the same point we discussed > here. You can't drive across a pedestrian highway, > other than at a designated point (like a dropped > kerb designed for vehicle use). > > http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5 > ,450326 This was rehearsed before. The conclusion was that the owner, because of the length of occupancy, has rights which predated and are preserved by the current (1988) legislation. And also (If anyone wants to read it): http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 Where Section 34(3) has: "3) It is not an offence under this section to drive a mechanically propelled vehicle on any land within fifteen yards of a road, being a road on which a motor vehicle may lawfully be driven, for the purpose only of parking the vehicle on that land." Mr Barber says a Southwark Council worker now has discovered a new offence. - "Southwark Council after many years has worked out how to give those cars tickets". However... A few weeks ago a Southwark Council operative hoisted the red car on to a Southwark branded tow lorry. After a three-way discussion between a parking warden, the lorry driver, and someone else on the other end of a telephone, the car was hoisted back to the private land. So at the time of the immediate alleged offence: A] the car owner had not parked the there, and B] the car was not driven across the kerb or the public pavement. On 16 april 1910 Siduhe wrote: "In short, unless he can show he picked up the car and dropped it into place without going across the rest of the pavement, he's committed an offence." I would like to know about this newly discovered offence that relates to non-public property. John K

Good picture, fazer71. It appears to show that the red car is legally parked on private property. John K

There is also this "strategic" matter under consultation which seems to have slipped under the radar. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1433553,1433553#msg-1433553 Should generate extra revenue for Southwark Council as it is extended across East Dulwich. John K

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > The car outside 11 Lordship Lane. Southwark > Council after many years has worked out how to > give those cars tickets. So the recent red car has > gone. Hopefully this is now permanently fixed. What was the newly discovered offence? Could this be applied to any other East Dulwich resident with off-street parking? John K

We have the East Dulwich Society.

London Gazette https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/notice?sort-by=latest-date&text=southwark&location-distance-1=1&categorycode-all=all&numberOfLocationSearches=1&results-page-size=10 John K

pebs Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Agree with the comments. What can be done/we do? http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/protection/process/online-application-form/

The area above the two reservoirs could provide a few extra playing fields. I don't think it would be much good as a "park". I doubt it will happen because of bio-security concerns. John K