Lishyloo

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Agreed. Peckham and Peckham rye are awfull places anyway. I'm sure if it was big posters offering parent and toddler coffee mornings there would be no obstruction by the typical easy Dulwich resident.

Mike_B Wrote: ignore their comments obviously just looking for an argument. I agree his name should not be broadcast without relatives consent. Typicle easy Dulwich busy body's that's the reason the place gets a bad reputation. ------------------------------------------------------- > James Barber Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I can understand calling him Mr.X. > > EDF threads sometimes go of at tangents. > > Not stating the persons name ensures that if > this > > thread did go of at a tangent the family > wouldn't > > feel powerless and as personal for them. > > Exactly. I'm fairly new here but thia forum seems > like a fairly close community. Personalising the > conversation by adding Mr. X's name could make the > family feel uncomfortable. Imagine, a group of > friends is talking about someone's recently > deceased relative and then send the transcript to > them by post. Sure, you can do some research and > easily find out his name but it's not about that.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And I don't agree re the Uplands, I think the > Actress is a vast improvement. I live round the > corner, and I didn't like the vibe in the Uplands > at all, whereas I like the Actress. > > You're missing my point Sue, The Actress is > undoubtedly a vast improvement. > so your saying that the people who drank in there where scum? > The Uplands pre 2002 was a traditional pub > building. It was a dive, but a nice building. > > It was then completely gutted, and remained a > dive, but one that felt like a cinema foyer. The > nice bits of the building could not be replaced. > > The Actress is NOT a dive (although not really my > bag), and is miles better than The Uplands, buit > the gutting of the building in 2002 can not be > undone, so the nice stuff about it is lost > forever. That is all I am trying to say, I thought > it was pretty clear.

Saddo

What ed needs is a kareokee bay with a late license

Lol let them get on with it I'm sure if it was a poncey coffee shop no-one around ed would complain

dds29 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hello James, > I walked past the Papa John's trailer again > today; they've manoeuvred it into an even more > prominent position, (if that's possible) any news > from the council? and can we add complaints, and > to whom?Get a life the lot of you > dds

VivianneL2011 Wrote: Dont use dulwivh hamlets the place is filthy with most machines been unuseable, the chainging facillities are of a very low standard and there is a notice in the sauna telling people to stop weeing in the coals. classy ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm currently at the David Lloyd in Kidbrooke > which is a good 15min drive away (30mins on a Sat) > and that is just too far - gym needs to be close > by. Ideally I'd love one with a pool...and easy > free parking. > Anyone got any suggestions?

randombloke Wro Well done to Sam but do you really think sainsburys will give a dam for what he did for them? No doubt the police will want to speak to him too for assaulting the thug. Get well soon. ------------------------------------------------------- > I do despair when I read people moralising about > things like this. Fathers of small children who > wouldn't thank him for getting killed? Why didn't > he get stuck in a bit earlier? PLEASE do me a > favour. > > What matters here is that a vile, violent thug > assaulted a man (Sam)doing his job. That he was > beaten to the ground and then kicked in the head > shows what a thug the man was. Hopefully Sam is > ok, and suffered no lasting damage. Sam may have > been foolhardy but he had noble intentions and > acted with courage and selflessness. Absolutely > Sainsburys should have more than one guard but 99% > of the time they don't need them, this was the 1% > when they did. I'm no expert but I suspect that we > all have our own way of dealing with these sort of > things in the heat of the moment. I've stood by > and watched in the past and I've also chased after > and apprehended a thief when my girlfriends > handbag was snatched. I'd hope if I saw someone > being viciously assaulted I'd have the balls to > intervene and stop it happening. I don't have > small children, I have a grown up one but I'd > still want to look him in the eye and be able to > say I did something and didn't stand back, I think > he'd respect me more if I did. I'd hope he'd > intervene too. > > There's a story sbout Nikita Kruschev addressing a > meeting and a lone voice said "You saw what Stalin > was doing, why didn't you try to stop him?", > Kruschev quietly asked, "Who said that?" to which > there was a resounding silence. "So, now you know > why"was his withering response.