JahSE22

Laddy Muck Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > womanofdulwich Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I'd say it was a compliment. E.g. you are not a > > two-faced old bat!- this is true- but why do > > people say it? am I naive and unsophisticated > and > > everyonenelse is two faced? Surely not. I > always > > think everyone is like me - but maybe they are > > really scoffing?? why else are they saying it? > > Well, assuming they are not being two-faced old > bats themselves when saying you are "natural", I > think that - in all probability - that is how they > see you and wish you to know of their feelings. > BUT, it could also be a way of them hiding their > feeling(s) which could perhaps be stated as > something like "I really like you" or "I like > being with you" and so on. I hope I am making > sense. I think this is becoming a debate and not a game anymore lets bring the Europeans to have more fun in the pitch. Everyone here are very good but not us good as I could of wish for for my b....s.

As for so-called rogue states in the Middle East, they are not a dire threat to vital US interests, except inasmuch as they are a threat to Israel. Even if these states acquire nuclear weapons ? which is obviously undesirable ? neither America nor Israel could be blackmailed, because the blackmailer could not carry out the threat without suffering overwhelming retaliation. The danger of a nuclear handover to terrorists is equally remote, because a rogue state could not be sure the transfer would go undetected or that it would not be blamed and punished afterwards. The relationship with Israel actually makes it harder for the US to deal with these states. Israel?s nuclear arsenal is one reason some of its neighbours want nuclear weapons, and threatening them with regime change merely increases that desire.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @Otta. I can understand that some people > may take exception to the comparison, but > it's still valid, nonetheless. > > It's really not. > > Anyway, I'm off. Of course not there are some Europeans who are married and ....I have done some work for their parents.

Yes, definitely Yes very different. You can have a good fish if you are hungry as this is the only thing you want easy catch, go for eat :))

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well UKIP is a bit of a refuge and rag bag. Just > wondered what kind of UKIP type you are. Sounds > like you are anti Europe but not an Ugly dog > (thats the dog not you) owning forenger hating > skinhead! Which is good though I am not anti > Europe but anti the Euro! Wow nice looking = "UGLY" dog we know the meaning again ! Who said That the Latins or the Europeans maybe they are blind.

womanofdulwich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'd say it was a compliment. E.g. you are not a > two-faced old bat!- this is true- but why do > people say it? am I naive and unsophisticated and > everyonenelse is two faced? Surely not. I always > think everyone is like me - but maybe they are > really scoffing?? why else are they saying it? ,,,

JahSE22 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > James Barber Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Hi the-e-dealer, > > I'm no fan if Boris but he cancelled unfunded > > projects. Ken Livingstone was very clever to > talk > > about projects and fund then with relatively > tiny > > sums to give the impression they were happening > > when they weren't. Boris cancelled them. > > > > We need Madrid style local government. They > decide > > to build a new tube line, spend 6 months > designing > > it, 3 years building it and the firt trains run > > before reelections. Amazing. > > > Seams like Boris has annoyed all his mates.

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi the-e-dealer, > I'm no fan if Boris but he cancelled unfunded > projects. Ken Livingstone was very clever to talk > about projects and fund then with relatively tiny > sums to give the impression they were happening > when they weren't. Boris cancelled them. > > We need Madrid style local government. They decide > to build a new tube line, spend 6 months designing > it, 3 years building it and the firt trains run > before reelections. Amazing. Seams like Boris has annoyed all his mates.

Consequential Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I mentioned in my introductionary thread that I'd > be typing some observations/comments on the > subject of political correctness. Sorry for the > delay. > > A trend stretching back over the last decade has > overseen the distortion through media (mainly > audio-visual) of what's a fact, and how you can > alter or omit some of the fundamental aspects of > that fact in order to appeal (and appease) to the > broadest audience possible. Now, some will > understandably argue that such a tactic makes > perfect economic sense: more bums in seats, > crosses boundries, future production potential, > etc. But should we continue to sacrifice facts > that may not appeal to everyone, but are usually > undeniable facts (or in some cases of regional > fiction or culture: valid assumptions) regardless, > to attract a wider audience? > > Many of these recurring distortions are > broadcasted or circulated by various media outlets > and often manifest themselves (among others) in > modern renditions of historical and cultural > events i.e - Robin Hood. A 2006 release made by > Tiger Aspect Productions for the BBC, the legend > of Robin Hood, is a recent-ish case in point. > Picture Friar Tuck. Most online results deliver > the consensus expectation of those familiar with > the character. What made the aforementioned > production controversial, to a degree, was that > the actor cast to play Friar Tuck is black, as > opposed to the classical depiction: a white man. > As good an actor as David Harewood is, his casting > as Tuck was a contradiction of what's widely > acknowledged/expected. This is a clear example of > the more obvious axioms of political correctness > (alongside intimidation): overall, positive > appeal. But where does it stop? If we found > ourselves somewhere in the future where actors > cast to play slaves in the Transatlantic Slave > Trade were white, would black people take offense > at such a contradiction that's designed to appeal > (and appease) to the widest possible audience, > regardless of what the facts are? > > I'm guessing they would. Some people have the ability to understand other peoples comments and for me specially it has been very clear and I could not argued with that, If I say I didn't because it has taken a lot of time to make sure what I read on newspapers was right, not to give the wrong opinion to the editor. Perhaps some people work harder to swerve the subject but for some of us has been very clear. So to clarify my concept I would like to highlight that there isn't any ghosts in the town if not the information was given by it's own newspapers. Like for example the Daily Mail If I have to discuss about the Daily Mail it will take me hours and hours is being a while since. I will have to go through all my papers and at the moment I don't have time and some people may disagree and I would never finished writting it. Here is one (STRIKE) the police etc. I would like to leave all the comments to the editor because they know what I am talking about. Was a good exercise for us all and so be more careful when dealing with other issues like the inoffensive children in the poor areas who get punish by their own parents etc. Some kids will just let go but bear in mind it will happen one day, some were, somebody. The police and politicians was there to warn parents that some policies need it to be change for the near future for the safety of some childrens ! Predictions what can happen in the future no one knows. I can go now as my job is done and hope everything is clear. I can only congratulate myself for the job I did in helping the Daily Mail but they never notice the job I did and I never got pay for that because I was very profession. I must say they did a wonderful job for me too so I can't complain. Thanks guys, all the best to all of you.Now I am happy to go as I don't have nothing else to do was a good game with hamster in future becareful with the broken glasses he,he,he nobody would commint to a such a thing not even in 100 years. If I meet my girlfriend I will encourage her to join as nothing has happen here. Was only a class.

Well being natural you can't tell peoples personalities if you don't know well eough the person without the facts and so on.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "If the government is using the revenue to give > perks to public sector workers that they cannot > have themselves " > > Whilst is should indeed be noted that many in the > private sector have indeed seen many "perks" > decimated (the pain of reading my last pension > update still smarts), it's fair to say that > phrases "public" and "private" sector are too > broad brush > > What many people (from the Occupy protesters and > the strikers) have noted is that for many people > in the private sector it's bonanza time still. > Simply put, money is out there. And whilst any > attempt to suggest those well off could contribute > more is met with "politics of envy!!" or "they > will leave the country! leave them alone!!", > whereas any time a meagrely salaried person does > something to keep what they have been > contractually promised is met with "tough > titties" > > So yes, there is a big pool of piss, but it's not > impossible to disperse. But the people with the > hose are inside and don't want to get dirty Straferjack I have to disagree with your post !:-$

Accept

Oh !As a Lion King :)

Yes I think so too.

Come what May - Moulin Rouge (O.K..)

....

There is a good Bucher in Holland Park Rd you won't miss it everyone knows.

Vision of Love : Mariah Carey

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "How do you regulate OTC derivatives trading to > achieve robust risk pricing without stifling > genuine creativity in capital markets?" Call me a > cynic but I doubt I am going to get interesting > answers to those questions from a moonlighting > social worker in Peruvian knitwear. > > :)) > > Thanks DaveR You have PM

Only one song. Beat me Baby : The bitters