Discussion regarding birth choices is always coloured by our own anecdotal experiences - which even when they are larger than the average sample (i.e. a doula, or a much wider sample of an obstetrician) are still anecdotal. That's why this study is so interesting and so overdue. I think this thread has such a great range of perspectives. SBryan-I agree (and indeed talk about it in my post) that the vast differences in homebirth team set-ups is something that warrants investigation - and, if homebirth is to be a viable and expanding option for women, real homebirth teams need to be used. I'd like to clarify that, as my post was in relation to the Birthplace in England study, my comment that 'giving birth is safe' relates entirely to our contemporary birth culture and location. I am simply echoing the words of the study authors themselves and would strongly contest your statement that this is nonsense. I would be interested to hear which other points in my post are nonsensical - I am keen to keep learning. MonkeyI do fail to see why anyone - even if they have never given birth let alone been at quite a few - shouldn't opine. You are of course giving your opinion here re: the need for proximity to medical equipment and, all likelihood is you experience of birth is less than mine. I'm sorry that the phrase 'awe-inspired' put you off reading my post too. Maybe it is a bit cringe-y come to think of it. Maybe I'll change that. I guess that being with lots of women through pregnancy and birth and seeing them doing amazing things makes you feel a bit gushy.
