Jump to content

DGB

Member
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DGB

  1. Marmora Man


    That's a particular political debate, I personally would disagree with what you say, but I was only taking up opposition to what FrustratedLawyer had said about HH's comments not being classicly socialist, and demonising affluence.


    They were socialist and didn't demonise affluence. (Although I'm sure some people would say that sentence contradicts itself).

  2. Well said Huguenot.


    Harriet's points are clearly in keeping with 'classical socialist thinking', and I think suggesting that she is 'implicitly seeking to demonise perceived affluence' is absolute crap.


    All she said is that where the availability of funds is limited, it should go to the area of greatest need; that the idea that NCR market should receive the same developmental funding as East St market, is flawed.


    Her comments provoke no class rivalry, whereas FrustratedLawyer's do exactly the opposite.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...