Well said Huguenot. Harriet's points are clearly in keeping with 'classical socialist thinking', and I think suggesting that she is 'implicitly seeking to demonise perceived affluence' is absolute crap. All she said is that where the availability of funds is limited, it should go to the area of greatest need; that the idea that NCR market should receive the same developmental funding as East St market, is flawed. Her comments provoke no class rivalry, whereas FrustratedLawyer's do exactly the opposite.