Raeburn

Is what I’ve just done.

It’s all images of proteins, cancer cells etc? There’s one of scattered data set graphs early on. Are you looking at the same article?

All discussion on here is about mis-interpretation/mis-representation of LTN data, or LTN data incorrectly gathered. Never images? If anything the article highlights issues with conflating and projecting to draw conclusions.

Heartblock, this article is about flaws in visual images used in research papers.

What are you talking about Rockets? The policy was there, it was bought forward in Covid to enable safer, better travel for people to get about their lives.

Rockets .....car sales are down, house-prices are down, maybe everything is down? Testament to Isla is that they keep their value, are serviceable, and get passed on as children outgrow them - the small ads on here show that.

In the images posted above you can see the emergency access route is clear/unaltered. Top one, just below the Carlton Avenue sign.

The sign (in the picture above) reads; ‘….Yinka Illori designed the modular pavilion to be used for future projects just like this’.

Quick look on Google street view/Apple Maps Look Around, you can find the site more clearly using details in 2nd pic - end of cemetery, high brick wall, lamp post etc. The location is further along Court than the foreshortening in first pic makes it appear. Both Street View and Look Around images are pre-LTN, and there?s no yellow lines either side at this point. The narrow access problem existed long before 2020.

Amsterdam? The entire city is now pretty much one-way, creating neighbourhood cells and preventing through traffic. Roadspace for vehicles is minimised, giving priority to walking, cycling and active travel. It's the gold standard for healthy street design - projects based on it are literally called 'mini-Holland'. https://robertweetman.wordpress.com/2019/03/19/i-want-my-street-to-be-like-this/ Fifty years ago Stop Killing Children' protests occurred across Holland, including Amsterdam, where residents closed residential roads to through traffic, and prevent drivers killing more kids; https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2013/12/12/amsterdam-children-fighting-cars-in-1972/ That's why you were able to enjoy cycling in the city so much.

Rockets Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Raeburn - I still hold-out I saw an analysis of > increase in car ownership within the Waltham > Forest LTN based on DVLA registrations, and as I > stated at the time some were suggesting it could > be linked to the gentrification of the area post > LTN installation. If I find that post I will be > sure to share it with you but I didn't make it up > - so, no, I won't be correcting my post on the > basis of analysis by Rachel Aldred (which is clear > what you are basing your assumptions on - but do > feel free to correct me if you're not). > > It is interesting isn't it that a basic Google > search on Waltham Forest LTN car ownership leads > you to the inevitable SEO optimised Rachel Aldred > and Anna Goodman articles on how wonderful the LTN > in Waltham Forest is - which in itself is quite > telling but I suspect that's a discussion for > another day and I don't want to trigger an > accusation of deflection from you! ;-) Please post when you find it, genuinely curious where your story comes from. SEO'd or not, I'd have thought this would be big news in such a long-running, model project. DuckDuckGo doesn't turn up anything, nor including Vincent Stops as you mentioned (a detail that resonated with the London Fields story I suggested). Best of luck with your quest.

Rockets, I was genuinely curious, I first asked where you had read; 'Waltham Forest's LTN led to a significant increase in car ownership within it's boundaries.....' and what a 'significant increase' is. You didn't provide a source, because there isn't one. A basic google tells you otherwise about Waltham Forest LTN. Trying to help you, I suggested you could have mistaken it with relatively recent chatter about London Fields LTN? There was FOI, which the initial poster mistakenly added a '0' to a figure and passed off as a huge rise in vehicles in the LTN. Maybe it was nothing to do with your first post, but your 'significant increase' resonated with this story. You're now deliberately conflating two different stories/falsehoods, and somehow putting the onus on others to distract from your own misinformation being called out. Bit late, but I'd ask you again to correct your post.

But Rockets, you were happy to post complete disinformation about an LTN on the other side of London?

The London Fields one was a made-up figure that was posted with an extra '0' on it. Please correct your earlier post to highlight that car ownership went down in Waltham Forest LTN.

Rockets Wrote: > And on the Waltham Forest increase of car > ownership within the LTN I am trying to find it (I > believe it was something Cllr Vincent Stops > tweeted based on DVLA data for registered cars > within the postcodes within the LTNs and that it > was linked to the gentrification of the area on > the basis of the LTNs). You might mean London Fields, and the stat which was posted and subsequently dismantled?