BrandNewGuy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't mind about lycra one way or the other, but > to me it signals racing. You simply don't need to > wear lycra to cycle to work. The Dutch manage to > cycle in their ordinary clothes and their weather > is not noticeably better than ours. It really isn't about racing. I wear Lycra because after the first few rides into work in normal clothing, it was deeply unpleasant (for me and probably my coworkers too) to be sitting around in sweaty clothes for the 2 hours it took to dry. My commute is 40 minutes and it's plenty of time to get pretty gross. Even if you change, you still need to change back into the clothes to get home, and a normal tshirt and trousers won't be dry by the end of the day. Believe me, a fair few of us really do need the Lycra / fast drying workout style clothing to commute. And I'm well aware that I don't look attractive in it, but needs must. Besides, it's not a fashion show, I just want to get to work and atone for the bacon sandwich I'll have when I get there. With regards to the racers - I've been taking a very well-travelled cycling route to work for the past two years, and while there are a handful of racers, really there's only 2 or 3 out of the 40 or so cyclists I see every morning who stand out as being d*ckheads. Going fast shouldn't be an issue; it is entirely possible to cycle quickly and safely. The vast majority obey the rules, but as a previous poster mentioned, no one remembers the ones who follow the rules. Just like the vast majority of motorists don't run red lights or cut me up - I just tend to remember the ones who do.