Lordship 516

jaywalker Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Erat vetus in Angliam post brexit: nostra carior > ulla spes does panis. Donec et mente confusa est > spes. nunc se ..... duas tantum res anxius optat, panem et circenses. [Juvenal]

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Quid a ?L note emendare non possis?... placet ut det mihi

Lynne Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Horace, I believe You are correct - apologies Nam tua res agitur, paries cum proximus ardet. It is your concern when your neighbor's wall is on fire. Book I, epistle xviii, line 84 Virgil also includes a reference in Book 2 - Iam proximus ardet Ucalegon - now next to him Ucalegon blazes ...but Ucalegon was a friend of Priam in the Illiad [Horace] a character that Virgil borrowed for the Aeneid [they were friends & borrowed from each other]

"Nam tua res agitur proximus ardet" [Virgil] quisque sibi proximus

Noli nothis permittere te terere...

Deliveroo

Middle

Henry_17 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > JW, L16, > > What you are missing is that if there were to be a > large surprise in inflation it would lead to > mayhem in asset prices. This would be unpopular > and so the government and central bank who after > all have complete control won't let it happen. Ho Ho HO ..! If only it were so simple. The Government & central banks have only very little control of inflation or asset values. Inflation & other economic impacts creep up on any economy & are also susceptible to external events & influences - we are dangerously close to the point where the little control they have in the UK will cease to be effective. Most companies are holding back on passing on price increases & are maintaining jobs but that cannot hold out forever. Today's economic picture looks reasonable but based on lagging data. The new year [Q1 & Q2 2017] will show very different outcomes - lets see what the picture is like next September/December.

Salt

Stick

Yup !

Linux

Hash

shop

mess

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm missing the reason as to why this is going to > an Irish court?? Because "The aim of the case is to establish whether or not Article 50 can be reversed once it is triggered to be adjudicated upon by the ECJ." This is a matter for the European courts to decide & Maugham is merely using the Irish courts a a means to get it referred to the European courts for a decision. Jolyon Maugham QC is also trying to argue that Article 50 has actually been "de facto" or constructively implemented but this is likely to fail as the procedure is explicitly set out in Article 50 for this to happen. The Irish courts are likely to refer the matter to the European courts for a decision. The Irish courts won't stray into matters where the UK courts have direct jurisdiction and will likely not offer any opinion except to refer it onward to the European Courts or maybe dismiss it on grounds of the Irish courts not being the proper venue for an application of this nature at this time.

pursuit

A British lawyer is launching a fundraising campaign in a bid to bring the issue of Article 50 to the Irish courts. Jolyon Maugham QC is hoping the legal challenge to Brexit will be referred from the Irish High Court to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The aim of the case is to establish whether or not Article 50 can be reversed once it is triggered to be adjudicated upon by the ECJ. http://www.independent.ie/business/brexit/uk-barrister-to-bring-article-50-clarification-case-to-irish-high-court-35282885.html

Significant

Alternative

Godber

Beckinsale

cert

Bushbaby

deceive