beaver14uk

Too late now, but to go back on this all buses should stop on diversion thats the agreed procedure.

It fairness I understand our frustations as I sent people from Canada Water to Lewisham to get to Peckham via train only to be told you sholdn't - why quick and easy route to me. zeban Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > what annoyed me so much was that on the news they > mentioned tubes and trains would be accepting bus > passes for reasonable journeys but when I got to > Peckham Rye they said they weren't- it was only > tubes which obviously I'd use if there were any > around here! I kicked up a fuss and they let me > through but really, quite ridiculous in an area > where we don't have tubes. > > ETA: I was going two stops so seemed a reasonable > journey and one I usually take on the 37 so no > other choices but to walk other than the train > which obviously isn't impossible but still the > lack of communication was a bit of a nightmare. > And what's with the TFL ebsite- it's really hard > to navigate!

For the very simple reason that if information had been published last night, this morning it would be out of date as some drivers decide to work,you can't pre-plan, all you can do is update the information.

http://unite.newsweaver.co.uk/images/3341/10792/2708735/BUS%20injunction.pdf

No the 176 will not be operating. lpool Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 176 should be ok but not sure about any others as > tend to be run by London Central.

No these routes will not operate, nor will route 12. Its routes operated by London General (Go-Ahead), Metroline and Arriva the Shires that will operate). In a nutshell the only route that should be operating is route 37. Zebedee Tring Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It seems that the 176 and 185 are running, and > possibly also the 12, 36 and 63. The three bus > companies who are not striking because of the > injunctions against them are Go-Ahead, Arriva and > Metroline.

What can you put. As I have already said plan on the basis of no buses and you won't go far wrong.

Its really not going to be clear until Friday morning when its known home many people turn up for work. I personally would plan on the basis of no buses operating then you won't be disapointed.

Start planning alternative travel arrangements now. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18461358

I can imagine then everyone would complain about the congestion.

Your quite right. I suspect that it was typed up quickly as the incident was happening and someone got there Groves and Road muddled. I am sure the buses went the correct way. Gidget Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > beaver14uk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Rte's 40,176 & 185 are diverted from Lordship > Lane > > via > > East Dulwich Grove - Rye Lane - (rtn via > Peckham > > High St - Claytob Rd - Hanover Pk) - Peckham > Road > > - > > Camberwell Rd LOR > > > > Rte 484 curtail to East Dulwich Sainsbury's > > > > > > Rte 345 - curtailed to Brixton Stockwell Pk > Walk > > > > Rte's 35 & 45 are diverted s/b fromCamberwell > Road > > via > > Camberwell New Road - Brixton Road - Brixton > Town > > CentreLOR > > You mean East Dulwich Road, not Grove.

Rte's 40,176 & 185 are diverted from Lordship Lane via East Dulwich Grove - Rye Lane - (rtn via Peckham High St - Claytob Rd - Hanover Pk) - Peckham Road - Camberwell Rd LOR Rte 484 curtail to East Dulwich Sainsbury's Rte 345 - curtailed to Brixton Stockwell Pk Walk Rte's 35 & 45 are diverted s/b fromCamberwell Road via Camberwell New Road - Brixton Road - Brixton Town CentreLOR

The drivers receive instructions from TfL as to the agreed diversion whatever company runs the route. I don't know the indivdual circumstances but sometimes work can finish ahead of schedule and TfL is not told, or the Response van has not had a chance to re-open the stops, for example might have been tasked to an accident. If buses are back to line of route buses would be advised by radio. I appreciate that with stops closed this can be confusing to passengers however, with limited resources until someone can attend stops will remain closed. As I say I am only using an example of what can happen. aquarius moon Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What a shambles! > > People waiting at the Inverton Rd temporary bus > stop for buses that were never going to arrive, > Others, me included standing on the corner of > Stuart Rd, ready to run in whatever direction the > buses appeared > from! > > Coming back from Peckham this afternoon, I was on > a 343 directly behind a 484. The 484 carried > straight on down > Cheltenham Rd, whereas my bus turned left into > Stuart Rd. > > Both buses are run by the same company. Are the > drivers not told in advance which route they are > supposed to > follow or do they just please themselves? > > And if the diversion has ended, why are the bus > stops still displaying 'not in use signs?'

Indeed Bic Basher you are right the driver is only human after all.

At last someone speaking some sense:)-D

If you look at all the treads on here all it seems to be is crime in the area so my answer would be be there is nothing I like about it move out quickly like anyone has with common sense - happy new year.

I am led to believe that the diversion came off this afternoon at 1300.

So as I said it was Thames Water.

Indeed - I think the first thing I would do its call Thames Water rather than post on the internet. Some people.

A long shot but give Catford garage a call who run the P4. CATFORD (TL) 180 Bromley Road, Catford, London, SE6 2XA Tel : 020 8461 9261

Just think of all the money being spent on replacing these buses - only glad that the London tax payer foots the bill and not me. James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Attached is bus route 12 consultation letter. > What do you think? > > From November 2011 the bendy buses on bus route 12 > will be changed to normal double deckers. This > will make the lives of those on Etherow Street far > more bearable and something we've campaigned on. > > To compensate for smaller passenger loads per bus > more buses will run. So overall slightly better > frequency. Equally bendy buses have a reputation > as ?free buses? so capacity can be marginally > reduced as you can?t get on a normal double decker > without paying. > > Only caveat I have is that countdown real time bus > information wont be isntalled at all bus stops. > Waiting around for 30 minutes at nighttime is bad > enough but not having information if a bus is > cancelled could see a wait of upto 90minutes. > Having information means passengers can change > their plans.

Here Here Ann. Whilst i think its great that buses are accessible at times people do not appreciate that prams need to be folded if buses are busy - something which many are not pre-pared or don't know how to do. I appreciate the example on the 63 the bus was empty. Years ago not folded can't get on but then I think society was more disaplined then.

The problems in many locations can be bad parking preventing you pulling in properly to the kerb. Although, I appreciate this is not always the case and some drivers are clearly not as good as others. As for street furniture i.e. bins these seem to be placed sometimes in the most inconvenient places hindering bus drivers at stops. edanna Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Wheelchairs always go through the back door > because that's where the ramp comes down. Use the > bus quite alot, though not the 63, and it's > normally fine. What bugs me is the way drivers > often stop miles from the kerb, or with a lamppost > or bin right in the middle of where you need to > get off.

Nigel - the stupid name for him on here is alive and well and still working on the 185 ClareC Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Must admit I rarely use buses these days, tend to > walk everywhere within reason. The driver did get > off at Peckham Library so was obviously close to > having his break, the ridiculous part was that it > took longer for him to wait for me to fold the > buggy etc than it would have done for me to board > at the other doors! > > Maybe it was the infamous Nigel ;-)

Goes without saying to check engineering works as most weekends the Jubilee line is down. It certainly is Monday.