CPR Dave

The fact everyone has had a CCTV camera in their pockets for the last 15+ years has done a huge amount to prevent and mitigate random drunken violence. Thugs can't get away with what they used to anymore.

Do you mean that there are only very few trades people and that all of their thousands of happy customers post glowing reviews but most of them have only ever posted once to recommend said trade person on the trade person's own thread? If so, I agree it's mysterious.

I'd try the Dulwich Village or "North Dulwich Triangle" forums for more local knowledge but I don't think those areas compare to Abeville Road at all. It will be quite a different lifestyle.

What about the places they go to after 11 as it is? I think a lot of the reticence will stem from the fact that someone turning 18 now will ha e loads of school mates who are still only 17 and the liability for serving underage people is huge, plus the loss of profit selling mostly only soft drinks makes 18th birthdays a hard sell in pubs / clubs.

Have had a prompt reply from Mr McAsh. The documents are available here... https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=8364

Thanks, will let you know how I get on.

Does anyone have the councillors email addresses please? I will email them this afternoon asking if the new CPZ has been agreed for Melbourne Grove, when that decision was taken and where the consultation documents and other papers can be found. I will then post any replies I get on this thread.

This is a huge part of the problem. Starmer is only interested in himself, not in what is best for our country. There's a litany of stuff he's done for spiteful jealous personal reasons which has damaged the nation enormously. Burnham would be a much better leader than of the other dross left behind when Starmer goes. To inflict a worse leader (and PM) upon us for his own selfish reasons would add to the problems and be entirely in keeping with his woeful premiership so far.

The curbs, that stop cars driving over the pavement, have also been removed on that junction. The whole junction is very badly designed.

do you believe they would send an honest reply?

It would be fine if they stayed in lane and obeyed the highway code. As it is, there are far too many putting themselves in danger breaking the law, which is unbelievably selfish.

Lower road is awful. Cyclists in the cycling lane ignoring traffic lights cutting across both lanes of motor vehicles. Cyclists not in the cycling lane, not queuing with the traffic for traffic lights, and so being forced to overtake stationary cars in the now too narrow lanes by cycling on the wrong side of the road, into oncoming traffic. It's a very poorly designed scheme that clearly took zero account of the way cyclists actually behave.

I've ridden them before. Took one to Dulwich Village once and couldn't park it. The designated parking bay on Pickwick Road was completely full and I couldn't end the ride. So I had to go back up to Herne Hill. would not recommend lime biking to Dulwich Village.

I'm guessing "ASB" excludes cyclists jumping red lights.

They are being taxed into oblivion. a lot of them, previously fully subscribed (we'll call you, don't call us) are no advertising desperately for new pupils, even paying for those bulk junk mail drops.