fredricketts

Southwark Council gave permission to change the offices above the Co Op into flats for people coming out of prison, but withheld it from the Local residence.

Been against them from the beginning, if I can help any way, with computer work or as i have been doing spreading it in the different media groups. I live in Ashbourne Grove, I attended the last meeting protest in the village.

Haslev, Could not agree with you more, even pulling it down will be part of Dulwich history disappearing, for what; to overcrowd what was a good area.

Why not use the original ED police stn site in crystal palace/north? The police station in Crystal Palace Road, has holding cells and all the facilities necessary for East Dulwich, it served East Dulwich very well for years, Until some bright spark decided it was not big enough and decided to build a new one in Lordship Lane, and now it seems we do not need any sort of police station in East Dulwich. Now they have decided to over develop East Dulwich, and bring in more people and traffic, it seems to me, what with all these cut backs going on, because of the incompetence of Local Councils and the Government, Now is the time we need a police station, it?s probably one of the reasons crime figures are down, people just can?t be bothered anymore to report crimes etc, as nothing is ever done about them. And make no mistake crime figurers may be down according to the Gov stats, but they are still increasing and even more so because of the cut backs. WE NEED A POLICE STATION IN EAST DULWCH.

One hundred per cent right. But a wider impact on our society at large must be taken into account

Make Mr Barber Right. I would like to object to the granting of a 24 hour licence to the co-op at Lordship Lane SE22 for the following reasons: 1. We already have too many outlets for 24 hour Intoxicating liquor licensing in Lordship Lane. 2 The binge drinking and drunks in lordship lane every night has increased tenfold in the last 6 years, owing to the Government and Council policies, allowing night clubs and pubs to extend their drinking hours till the early hours of the morning, in residential areas, most of the time causing a nuisance to local residents. 3. We already have a parking problem at the end of Ashbourne Grove during the day time, and this is gradually getting worse of a night time, due to the clubs and pubs having extended hours, and to add, another outlet, all night will attract more cars and drunks to the area, causing more pollution and trouble to the area. I thought the council and the Government wanted to cut down on people binge drinking, yet now you are saying, you can drink twenty four seven. We will help you drink more by allowing twenty four seven drinking outlets. Really don?t make sense. You are, by allowing this, encouraging binge drinking, all day and night. Along with, ruining resident?s good way of life that they have enjoyed for years. I for one know that the area of Dulwich that I live in has slowly been deteriorating, through bad governments and councils changes to making profits and putting businesses profits in front of residents who have paid good money for their properties in order to live a nice peaceful life in a good environments?. That you are now destroying.

DJKillaQueen Apart from those two changes, there is nothing going to be significantly different at this junction. In fact, the bulk of the ideas proposed through the consultation process (in which I took part) have been ignored. WHEN DO THEY EVER LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC.

As a resident living close by to this and other developments, going on in East Dulwich, I am not concerned so much, as who takes over Icelands, What I am concerned about is the impact, that with more flats, and people, it will have on our way of life as residents, who have to put up with more speeding cars, more traffic congestion and pollution, less parking spaces, and parking space rage along with the violence, and more rubbish in the streets. This is what is already happening. Whatever, anyone on this site, can do to help stop the rot that is setting in East Dulwich, by objecting to these plans. I say thank you.

Details of planning application - 12/AP/3773 on Southwark?s web site... Date received: 22/11/2012 Statutory start date: 22/11/2012 statutory expiry date: 17/01/2013 Consultation period starts: 22/11/2012 Consultation period ends: 03/01/2013 Press notice date: Not required Site notice date: 11/12/2012 Environmental impact assessment status: Not required by Regs & nothing submitted Neighbours and statutory consultation: Consultation period and how to comment on an application To comment on this planning application please emails [email protected]. Please make sure that you state the application number and your postal address. Comments that you submit will be published on this website. I received a letter from Southwark Planning on the 12/12/2012. Telling me that the consultation period started the day that they received the Planning application, which was the 22/11/12, which according to my calculations that was three weeks ago. WHY ARE THEY NOW TELLING ME IN THIS LETTER THAT THE CONSULTATION PERIOD STARTS ON THE 15/12/12? Any one know the counils regulations on the consultation periods???

It is not meant for any indivudual, were there is big money to be earned there will always be corruption.and I have known Property develeopers in the past to have paid to get there Projects through planning.Why are the planners set on pushing this through?and When it is so obvious that parking problems in East Dulwich are increasing every day. And overcrowding is increasing. Its time residents were put first Over profit.It has always been the same, when,unless there is a big uproar the council will do what the want, and it appears More flats and houses no matter what the cost to residents ways of life. And it makes it easier for the parking services to extort money Out of us.

To many back handers floating around.

Thank you all for the warnings. They (Southwark parking services) always have a camera car opposite Ashbourne Grove, every day, just to catch the poor old motorist, who has not got used to the layout change, which the council have recently done. Weird how all of a sudden parking spaces have appeared in Lordship Lane, where as for years of motorist getting parking tickets, the Council have made these spaces available, and in their common sense, put one right outside Barclays Bank, stopping anyone coming out of Ashbourne Grove to turn right, not see what?s coming down the road. Could be some serious accidents, here. Just trying to get bits and pieces together for my appeal to PATAS, been turned down by the council on three occasions

Car has now been taken by its owner after four weeks. The point that I would like to make, is, how you can fight the powers to be, when all they are concerned about is making money from these unfair and unjust parking tickets. The service supposed to be for controlling traffic and the well being of Motorist and pedestrians, these PCNs are for neither.

kford Yes they are if you pay for it to be done.

Siduhe . Thank you for your offer of help, it?s very kind of you, I have photos, and they show that I am about six inches on my crossover and six inches with the front wheel on a hard concrete verge. But there is still 7ft left for pedestrians and wheel chair and pram users. The point I am trying to make is that Southwark parking Services are targeting motorist who, are not causing any of the criteria that is laid down, about causing obstructions to pedestrians and other road users, obstructions to wheel chair users, obstruction to pram users and other pedestrians. In other words it?s out to make many at the expense of the rate payers. If you live in a road where the road is not wide enough to take two way traffic, you sometimes have no option than to park on the concrete verge to avoid the big articulated vehicles that are allowed to use residential streets, and scratching the side of your vehicle and knocking off your wing mirrors. You are not causing any traffic problems, but they are still allowed to rip you off with a parking fine. . It?s purely for making money. And that should be against the law.