Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wonder if it could be the Health Survey for England http://www.hscic.gov.uk/healthsurveyengland which looks at child weight etc among other things. This is separate to the National Child Measurement programme that takes place in schools. We haven't had a visit for this but have been visited by Office for National Statistics before - in that case if you are one of their randomly selected households they are pretty persistent.

Thanks, edanna. I'll look into this. Hubby didn't get details from them and they didn't leave anything behind. They said we should have had two letters, which I can't find anywhere.


I'm starting to wonder if it has anything to do with me opting out of the national child measurement programme ... But that was a good two years ago...

I've never heard of anything called the child obesity survey. Were they there to see your child in particular (ie, by name), or were they collecting general information on random children?


There is something called the National Child Measurement Program, which is conducted through schools. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/ncmp


I've never heard of them making home visits for the NCMP. The data is collected through schools with the parents' consent. Participation is not compulsory. A child's height and weight is considered sensitive personal medical data, and it would need to be collected by a health professional.


Were the visits preceded by any verbal or written contact? And if so, what affiliation did the person give?


In addition to contacting the police, you may want to speak with your child's school and your GP/HV.


I share your curiosity and concern, wanting to know if anyone else has had a similar experience -- seems rather odd. xx

Thanks, Saffron. I've not got all the information such as exact affiliation, survey name etc... First time they called in, hubby had a fairy long conversation with them and the subsequent three times he's been very short with them.


The guys knocking on our door said we should have received two letters prior to their visit but I can't find these letters anywhere. And it's definitely my daughter they want to see. In fairness, they've offered an appointment but when we turned it down, asked if she was available now (!)


My GP is as puzzled and concerned as I am. Southwark Council's teams as well. Police have made a note of it. And I'll be speaking to the school at the beginning of term.


All a bit of a mystery!

"You can contact a member of the Health Survey for England team, Emma Fenn, using the free phone number 0800 526 397 or by emailing [email protected]." http://www.natcen.ac.uk/taking-part/studies-in-field/health-survey-for-england/contact-us/


They should presumably be able to confirm whether your child is on their sample list.

Why would HSfE only want to see a particular child? I thought they collected information on all the household members as a unit?


Plus, isn't most of their data collection survey-based? They'd only send a clinical professional to collect personal measurements once you'd been interviewed and agreed to participate, surely? And if you don't agree, then they can just bugger off!


DH thought this could be some bizarre CPS mix-up with another family, re child at risk of obesity-related issues ... but then why would they say it's a survey? And why wouldn't your GP know? And, surely anyone with a welfare concern would clearly identify themselves as from the HV/CPS/etc, no? It doesn't make sense.


A mystery indeed! And a dodgy/unprofessional one too!

Finally went to the bottom of it. It was the Health for England Survey as part of their Child Boost Survey.


In fairness, they dealt with me very well today and called me straight back, promising I wouldn't be contacted again. The survey's based on random postcode selection - they're looking to measure and weigh children between the age of 2 and 15.


Thank you all for your invaluable advice!

Nothing to do with data security for me, LM. I fundamentally and professionally disagree with the calculation that is used to derive BMI for children. It's different to the adult formula (which some people also believe is problematic). You can google various math nuts giving different interpretations, should you need a cure for insomnia.


I also don't want my daughter measured without me there. My daughter is very tall for her age, I already have enough trouble with her starting to be self-conscious, without it being compounded by some well-meaning but ultimately interfering government initiative. I don't want my daughter to focus from an early age on her height and weight as arbitrors of health. I'd rather she learn good diet and exercise. xx

I think too much data kills common sense.


Also had my data stolen in the past, which caused me no end of problems. And when I see how I was treated by health survey England, to whom the government entrusted data about my child, I'm going to be even more careful in future.

I would also be concerned - it's measured at school anyway, so I would not welcome a home visit at all.

If it were to be agreed in advance then would remove element of surprise but cold calling seems rather strange.


How about it if it were a survey to measure adult blood pressure? There are enough random doot knockers as it is.

Would ED welcome that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...