Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wonder if it could be the Health Survey for England http://www.hscic.gov.uk/healthsurveyengland which looks at child weight etc among other things. This is separate to the National Child Measurement programme that takes place in schools. We haven't had a visit for this but have been visited by Office for National Statistics before - in that case if you are one of their randomly selected households they are pretty persistent.

Thanks, edanna. I'll look into this. Hubby didn't get details from them and they didn't leave anything behind. They said we should have had two letters, which I can't find anywhere.


I'm starting to wonder if it has anything to do with me opting out of the national child measurement programme ... But that was a good two years ago...

I've never heard of anything called the child obesity survey. Were they there to see your child in particular (ie, by name), or were they collecting general information on random children?


There is something called the National Child Measurement Program, which is conducted through schools. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/ncmp


I've never heard of them making home visits for the NCMP. The data is collected through schools with the parents' consent. Participation is not compulsory. A child's height and weight is considered sensitive personal medical data, and it would need to be collected by a health professional.


Were the visits preceded by any verbal or written contact? And if so, what affiliation did the person give?


In addition to contacting the police, you may want to speak with your child's school and your GP/HV.


I share your curiosity and concern, wanting to know if anyone else has had a similar experience -- seems rather odd. xx

Thanks, Saffron. I've not got all the information such as exact affiliation, survey name etc... First time they called in, hubby had a fairy long conversation with them and the subsequent three times he's been very short with them.


The guys knocking on our door said we should have received two letters prior to their visit but I can't find these letters anywhere. And it's definitely my daughter they want to see. In fairness, they've offered an appointment but when we turned it down, asked if she was available now (!)


My GP is as puzzled and concerned as I am. Southwark Council's teams as well. Police have made a note of it. And I'll be speaking to the school at the beginning of term.


All a bit of a mystery!

"You can contact a member of the Health Survey for England team, Emma Fenn, using the free phone number 0800 526 397 or by emailing [email protected]." http://www.natcen.ac.uk/taking-part/studies-in-field/health-survey-for-england/contact-us/


They should presumably be able to confirm whether your child is on their sample list.

Why would HSfE only want to see a particular child? I thought they collected information on all the household members as a unit?


Plus, isn't most of their data collection survey-based? They'd only send a clinical professional to collect personal measurements once you'd been interviewed and agreed to participate, surely? And if you don't agree, then they can just bugger off!


DH thought this could be some bizarre CPS mix-up with another family, re child at risk of obesity-related issues ... but then why would they say it's a survey? And why wouldn't your GP know? And, surely anyone with a welfare concern would clearly identify themselves as from the HV/CPS/etc, no? It doesn't make sense.


A mystery indeed! And a dodgy/unprofessional one too!

Finally went to the bottom of it. It was the Health for England Survey as part of their Child Boost Survey.


In fairness, they dealt with me very well today and called me straight back, promising I wouldn't be contacted again. The survey's based on random postcode selection - they're looking to measure and weigh children between the age of 2 and 15.


Thank you all for your invaluable advice!

Nothing to do with data security for me, LM. I fundamentally and professionally disagree with the calculation that is used to derive BMI for children. It's different to the adult formula (which some people also believe is problematic). You can google various math nuts giving different interpretations, should you need a cure for insomnia.


I also don't want my daughter measured without me there. My daughter is very tall for her age, I already have enough trouble with her starting to be self-conscious, without it being compounded by some well-meaning but ultimately interfering government initiative. I don't want my daughter to focus from an early age on her height and weight as arbitrors of health. I'd rather she learn good diet and exercise. xx

I think too much data kills common sense.


Also had my data stolen in the past, which caused me no end of problems. And when I see how I was treated by health survey England, to whom the government entrusted data about my child, I'm going to be even more careful in future.

I would also be concerned - it's measured at school anyway, so I would not welcome a home visit at all.

If it were to be agreed in advance then would remove element of surprise but cold calling seems rather strange.


How about it if it were a survey to measure adult blood pressure? There are enough random doot knockers as it is.

Would ED welcome that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...