Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear All


We are currently looking for London based couples who own their own place and who would like to give it a dream make-over and it would be terrific if that was someone in East-Dulwich. Perhaps they are struggling to find the funds to do so, as we aim to help them with a bit of a boost. The programme will follow each couple as they embark on renovating a selected 3 rooms in their home with the help of a ?10,000 cash injection. We are really keen to spread the word as far as we can and would love to have some forum members from here, so we hope this may be of interest to you.


? Guys - are you passionate about creating a dream home in an inspired style, but never been given the chance


? Are you full of ideas but not got the funds?


? Girls ? do you and your partner spend every trip to B&Q arguing over which colour of paint will work at home?


? Or have you just moved into your partner?s place and think you need to put your personal design stamp on it?


? Would you like a cash injection of ?10K to help create your dream home?


To apply or for more information get in contact ASAP by email homes @ renegadepictures.co.uk


NB: To apply you must be the owner or mortgage payer at the property. You should not be living as a tenant in a rented property or be part of a shared ownership scheme that requires another party?s consent to carry out any form of alteration (large or small).


Thanks in advance


Kind regards


Fraser Mullen


Researcher | Mad About The House Series 2

:))


If only this had been last year ..... I shelled out over ten grand, never mind getting a "cash injection", nothing's finished and much of it has got to be redone.


Maybe I will investigate, but everything's in limbo at the moment, not sure I can bear putting myself through it all again :))

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about single parents? Why does it have to be

> a couple?



Hi,


Thanks for coming back to us. The format of the show is such that we are looking for couples, married or otherwise, as the guy and the girl tackle different aspects of a makeover during the programme. We need a couple who are living together as they will have different approaches, different outlooks and differing attachments to the home. Apologies if this discounts anyone.


Fraser

I think the couples thing is reasonable isn't it? This is entertainment after all, not a public service. They need to have at least two people to create that kind of conflict dynamic that hooks viewers.


I guess if you had determined headstrong teenagers it might achieve the same thing.


I'm not sure about the heterosexual thing. If it's the 'ED' profile they're aiming for, then their audience isn't going to take umbrage at a gay couple. I'd even make the sweeping generalisation that homophobic people aren't necessarily going to be the core audience of flouncy middle-class home makeover shows...

Hi Ian,


We are very much trying to find a London based couple for this series which, unlike most programmes, has actually been one of the more tricky tasks, possibly due to house prices. I contacted a number of major employers in the area and a couple of them suggested posting on here due to the number of subscribers and general good humour of the site! I cant pretend that I have tailored my 'puff' too much, however a friendly, creative, South Londoner (like myself as it happens) would be a great fit for the series (unlike myself who obviously cannot do it).


Warm regards and appreciation for your thoughts,


Fraser

Hi Andy,


When we have received and processed your application you will usually here from us within 2weeks if we are able to follow up on the interest. Obviously we have had quite a lot of reposnse to the series, but we are looking in London most feverishly at the moment so hopefully we will be able to be in touch.


Warm regards


Fraser

Hmmm. Thanks ianr, just looked at the website.


Seems actually what this is about is getting one partner to do stuff in the house without the agreement of or knowledge of the other, and then filming the resultant arguments :-S


I thought "mad about the house" meant enthusiasm - apparently it actually means, erm, ANGER. Aka good TV.


Of course I could be completely wrong ......


Think I'd rather stay friends/lovers with my partner than get ten grand for doing the house up in a way I might hate, but hey, that's just me :)


:-S

Hi Sue,


You are correct that it is one half of the couple who sets about the makeover, but they certainly do have the agreement and full knowledge of their partner and we speak in great depth with both halves of each couple, plus a few of their friends before we set about any of the filming - explaining in detail what is involved and the in's and out's of the format and structure of the show. It really isnt anger TV at all and pretty much without exception in the first series both halves were very happy with their homes after the makeover.


Unfortunately because the series went out more than a month ago there arent any clips available online, but we do try and find couples who would get a great deal out of taking part in the series.


Warm regards


Fraser

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...