Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I'm wondering if I can get any tips from people who may have extended into their side return of terraced house and how they have configured the kitchen, living area layout?

For example, have you got the dining table in the second/back reception room? Or do you have in the kitchen? Or does the back reception work better as a kids area?

The kitchen/side return area will be approx 22.8" x 15.2"s it more livable to have a wider opening from he back reception room into open plan area or just use the original French doors.

Any great tips, hindsight knowledge or things we should think about would be gratefully received!

We have the set up you describe. Wider opening into the second reception room from the extended kitchen. The dining table is in the second reception room but is visible and right off the kitchen. We have a sliding pocket door that can open or close off the two spaces as we want. In the kitchen extension we have the kitchen with island seating near the dining room and then a family room with sofa and chairs at the garden end of the room.


Its worked well for us as our garden is South facing and we can open up the space to the garden almost 9 months of the year. Its where everyone hangs out when we have loads of people are over and its the heart of family life.


The front reception room is where we have our telly and ends up as more private adult space. That front reception room can be opened to the dining space by opening the large double doors that separate the lounge from the dining room. The doors fold back against the wall so it feels really open when we do that. However, when we want more privacy or light a fire, we close them up and its very cozy!


I'm sure others will be on here with their own layouts and ideas. Good luck figuring out what works for your family!


A play room is also a popular option for the middle room. It just depends on your lifestyle and how much space you have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...