Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quite. I just don't get the prurient interest in this. I don't think any laws have been broken. Unless they have, or there is great comedy value, I don't have even the remotest interest in the sex lives of celebrities. They're not politicians.


alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People over 21 have sex. so.

Oh dear, it's all a bit messy


But fark, it's not 'if' this kinda thing is going to leak out, it's when


Do showbiz people live in a bubble, I suppose they do somewhat


And yeah, after a very short while on Twitter you'll see their names



Still, I'm sure there'll be a Hello magazine type renewing of vows in the not to distant future


😳

I agree that by taking out an injunction they have made it a much bigger story. I do have some sympathy with them however, in that this really isn't something which the press should have been publishing in the first place. It is a total invasion of privacy and potentially quite damaging to their family. I don't buy the argument that there is any public interest angle.

I got it now (duh!) it's a damage limitation excercise


EVERYONE knows who this is, and if you don't, then you were never interested or cared anyway, so that's you parked up


The big fella buys a million quid's worth of time, via an injunction of no use other than to stave of the inevitable 'publicity'


Meanwhile, it's common knowledge on 'internet' but not in news print/website of UK media


By the time 'it can be published' it's old 'yeah boring' news and barely 'page 4-5' news


Fireworks pissed on, and we move on

The injunction is only an interim stage anyway. If there wasn't a decent case that reporting the story was (in law) wrong they would never have got an injunction in the first place, so even if this goes expect the case to go on, with a claim for big damages in the event that they print the story.
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If the Qatari's decide to retaliate then it's all going off...but I suspect the Iranians are hoping for this - one inaccurate missile and the Qatari's may have to. I think the Iranian leadership is working on fast-tracking their own demise and the Americans and Israeli's planning for regime change, maybe with the many political prisoners the Israelis tried to free from the Elvin prison today. What a mess but clearly Iran was becoming a big threat to not only Israel but many of the other Gulf States and was clearly doing scary stuff with nuclear weapons that required action.
    • I can't find any references to an attack on a British base. where do you find one?
    • Flea darts...now there's a thing from my past I had long forgotten about - goodness our ! This thread title does always bring a smile to my face as I can't help but think it suggests a campaign to prevent the removal of someone's stash!
    • It was inevitable, but I think it'll blow over. Iran co-ordinated the attack with the Qataris, so as not to offend their mates, so Qatar was prepared. I hope it's just symbolic bluster and I think they're only targeting US bases.  Even if they target a UK base, I doubt it'll drag us into a conventional war with them.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...