Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Saw this & thought should share:


http://www.communitypractitioner.com/news/guys-and-st-thomas-reduces-number-of-posts-of-health-visitors-and-school-nurses


Wiith the ongoing battles with junior doctors & SAT's/threatened academisation of schools, this might not seem such a big thing, but this comes within a year of a 5yr project to increase HV numbers by 5000, and at a time when the importance of early intervention/perinatal and infant mental health have huge evidence bases (http://www.1001criticaldays.co.uk if interested).


While its LA's that are shouldering the decision making, pretty certain it's the cuts to the public health budgets from central government that force their hand.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/104891-cuts-to-public-health/
Share on other sites

Yes, which is why the savings made to future health/social care budgets via early intervention

is so important, also, given the investment of tax payers money into building HV numbers, it seems daft to be cutting back before the benefits pay off (might as well put money in a bond and then loose a load of it paying early payout fees), when a bit of patience would pay huge dividends.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...