Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My car buying experience to date is limited to handing over a few hundred to a private seller found on gumtree/autotrader in exchange for an old banger that lasts less than year. I now live further away from my family and need a reliable car so am thinking of doing it properly. I'm thinking of buying either a new Kia Sportage on PCP (4.9% APR) over a 3 year period or a two year old version with a personal unsecured loan (3.2% APR)over a four year old period. Interest rates aside, the main differences that jump out at me between the two options are that with option 1 the monthly repayments are lower and I won't own the car after 3 years but will have the option to buy it after 3 years or trade it in whereas with option 2, the monthly repayments are higher but I own the car from the start. A two year old Sportage is also going to be about ?2,500 cheaper. What i can't work out is whether owning a car outright from the start actually matters and whether getting caught up in the whole PCP 3 year cycle is a bad idea. The most expensive item I have ever purchased is a sofa so the maths and responsibility to make a good decision is driving me a bit mad!

So calling the financially savvy amongst you, which is the better option?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/106205-how-to-buy-a-car/
Share on other sites

There's not really a better option, but what suits you better - your finances, your intended use of the car etc.


I can't see the advantage of PCP over just choosing either to buy or lease. If you lease you pay a fixed amount every month and someone else takes all the risks of ownership. You could get a brand new Kia Sportage for about ?200/month for three years, and at the end of the period decide what you want to do next - lease another one, or something different, or buy something. During the three years the only restriction is a mileage limit - the cheapest deals limit you to 8,000 miles a year, but more miles will only cost you an extra ?10 a month.


If you buy you take on the risks of ownership, but over the long term its cheaper. Let's say you buy a two year old Kia Sportage for ?15,000, which you pay off over 4 years. You end up paying ?16,000 with the cost of credit, but if you keep the car for say 6 years, at the end of which it's worth ?5,000, the overall cost to you is ?11,000 over 6 years - ?150/month. It doesn't seem like much of a difference, but ?50/month over 6 years is ?3600 saved, and the longer you keep it the cheaper the overall cost. Kia cars come with a 7 year warranty and have a reputation for lasting a long time - buy a two year old car now and there's no reason why you can't drive it for another ten years.

DaveR thanks for the calculations, they're really useful. I hadn't actually thought about leasing as I'd somehow assumed it was a waste of money but it looks like it has advantages over personal contract.

Bobbsy thanks for your input too. I'm pretty sure you don't pay servicing when leasing.

I bought the car yesterday on PCP. I liked the low monthly repayments and was drawn to PCP (instead of leasing) as I would have a decent amount of equity in the car after 3 years if I wanted to trade the car in as Kia's hold their value. The equity varies from ?1,500 to ?4,000 depending on how well looked after the car is and mileage. For anyone else interested in the new Sportage, I managed to get ?1,800 off the list price and claimed the ?500 dealer deposit contribution. I am sure someone with a stronger stomach for haggling could do even better!


Thanks to everyone for their input.


Now for the 12 week wait...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...